houheffna
Ignoring Idiots
- Joined:
- May 6, 2009
- Posts:
- 8,673
- Liked Posts:
- 2,711
There's nothing weird about my take on barkley. I readily admit that he's an all-time great. But he could've been sooooo much more. And I'm about winning. Barkley cost himself championships. He has noone to blame but himself.
And as I already stated, rodman would be ranked a lot higher had he not done some off the wall stuff to say the least. I think hell be ranked a lot higher in the next all-time great ranking.
He did a lot of off the wall stuff ON THE COURT! Same as Barkley...yet again, Barkley is considered greater...thinking the only reason Rodman is left off the list is because he wore makeup is being real delusional.
And you are "all about winning"...which means you can't seem to notice that individual talent can be analyzed and compared even if one wins titles and another doesn't? If Barkley wins 1 title is he a better player than Rodman, how about 2? When is he better than Jordan? Did he need 7? 8? You should watch film of Barkley sometime...and see what he could do...
And by the way, saying that Barkley was better than Rodman doesn't mean that anyone is putting down Jordan's teammates. It does prove how great Jordan was.
But when exactly was Rodman a top 5 player? I know Barkley was at his best...but when did that happen for Rodman? I don't remember...