ZOMBIE@CTESPN
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Dec 19, 2012
- Posts:
- 18,073
- Liked Posts:
- 19,944
- Location:
- MICHIGAN
We all know this. Fans like to speculate.
I know I’m also trying to be negative so that we might sign bell lol
We all know this. Fans like to speculate.
It makes sense but I doubt it. You don't restructure Mack after year one for that. This seems like a rushed decision to make something happen.You know what maybe these moves are to extend a few players and not necessarily a play for bell
Could we not draft a back as well? Or even keep Howard? And Mizzel sucks, but I don't think Davis is a lead back either for longer than two games.
I missed the NFL’s announcement of Hunt’s suspension. You can’t be the answer if you can’t play.
This.Could be something they didn't want to do without assurances from a FA player that he was on board. That's a lot of cap room to clear. I have to think the other part of this will come today.
Can teams carry extra cap space forward indefinitely?
This.
They have pushed a good bit of money down the road, limiting future cap space.
That brings up a question. I am pretty good with cap stuff, but have never seen this addressed. In the past there was no cap space carry over, so any extra space was just lost. With the carry over does it really limit future cap space to any degree to push spending down the road? Any of the space created and not used is just pushed to the next year, so does that not directly cancel the extra dollars pushed from the preceding years? Can teams carry extra cap space forward indefinitely?
There are a lot of things they could do. There is no guarantee you get anything better than Mizzel in the draft.
Davis is better than Mizzel. He is not a long term feature back but a sight better option than Mizzel at 3.
You don’t make a bold move like this unless it’s for a bold move
This.
They have pushed a good bit of money down the road, limiting future cap space.
That brings up a question. I am pretty good with cap stuff, but have never seen this addressed. In the past there was no cap space carry over, so any extra space was just lost. With the carry over does it really limit future cap space to any degree to push spending down the road? Any of the space created and not used is just pushed to the next year, so does that not directly cancel the extra dollars pushed from the preceding years? Can teams carry extra cap space forward indefinitely?
Until Hunt gets a suspension and you are stuck with nothing.
I hope it's Bell, if just for the "interest factor". One Mike Davis thread already gave me "Mike Davis Fatigue". CCS is simply incredible at times.
What you say about Mizzel can be said about Davis. There is no guarantee Davis will be better than out draft pick, but he will cost 3 million. Mike Davis as a number two doesn't ease the pain of an injury to your RB1. Davis is a 3 at best, which I'd rather be a draft pick than someone making 3 million.
Again, had we signed Hunt we could just keep Howard, or trade him at the deadline, in addition to still drafting a RB. Then you just cut Mizzel and or Benny.I missed the NFL’s announcement of Hunt’s suspension. You can’t be the answer if you can’t play.
You seem to be bent out of shape over a couple million dollars.
Y’all are really setting yourself up for disappointment if it’s not.