- Joined:
- Sep 28, 2014
- Posts:
- 8,638
- Liked Posts:
- 10,147
- Location:
- Chicago, IL
30 mil down the drain.
30 mil down the drain.
- Joined:
- Apr 16, 2013
- Posts:
- 21,858
- Liked Posts:
- 9,050
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.co...to-chicago-may-be-interested-in-tyrod-taylor/
Jets believe Glennon with sign with the Bears and are moving on to Tyrod Taylor.
Jets believe Glennon with sign with the Bears and are moving on to Tyrod Taylor.
BearDownZZ
Active member
- Joined:
- Aug 21, 2012
- Posts:
- 493
- Liked Posts:
- 420
Yeah.. NY Daily News just said the Jets don't believe Glennon is worth $14 mil but think the Bears are willing to pay that. The probability of Glennon is starting to get higher.
Bearly
Guest
More rods.
Bearly
Guest
Sounds like loser talk. We didn't really want him anyway. Lets move on to Tyrod Taylor. You're our 2nd choice but we really want you.
- Joined:
- Sep 11, 2014
- Posts:
- 4,514
- Liked Posts:
- 3,017
I was worried about Pace bending to pressure from Fox to get a veteran in and try to save Fox's hide this year. So long as he drafts a QB early I can live with it. Also if the rookie beats out Glennon in camp they better not let money keep the rookie on the bench.
- Joined:
- Aug 23, 2012
- Posts:
- 22,772
- Liked Posts:
- 7,642
- Location:
- Enemy Territory via southern C
Cutler is better than Glennon, but its a good bottom out Lamar Jackson signing and will keep Pace busy adding talents in draft instead of mortgaging future in QB hunt.
1ke
D.I.L.L.I.G.A.F.
- Joined:
- Jul 11, 2011
- Posts:
- 3,401
- Liked Posts:
- 1,717
- Location:
- Milwaukee
My favorite teams
The problem isn't Mike Glennon. It's that money. It better not be anywhere above 11 mil. It just can't be. It can't.
Sent from my ZTE A2017U using Tapatalk
Sent from my ZTE A2017U using Tapatalk
Bearly
Guest
I expect an incentivized contract starting in the 12s but obviously a guess.
- Joined:
- Sep 11, 2014
- Posts:
- 4,514
- Liked Posts:
- 3,017
I would personally go Hoyer and a rookie as my preference. Hoyer costs less and less likely to block a rookie. But I can see why they would go Glennon, tons of cap space and gives a chance to see what Glennon can do. You never know he could turn out to be the answer, they already know Hoyer is not. I just hope that they won't let Glennon's contract or veteran status block a rookie if the rookie is outperforming him or else the fanbase will disembowel Fox.
- Joined:
- Sep 11, 2014
- Posts:
- 4,514
- Liked Posts:
- 3,017
Lamar Jackson will make for a fine RB for some team...
- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 37,894
- Liked Posts:
- 41,321
Rask you keep saying this about Jackson. He isn't going to be a QB in the NFL. I'm not saying he's going to be a bust, I mean he's not going to play the position of QB at all.
Even if he was, it makes absolutely no sense to be terrified of the top QBs in this class but be confident about his skillset translating.
- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 2,527
- Liked Posts:
- 2,191
But he runz real fast like...
- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 37,894
- Liked Posts:
- 41,321
Right. If they were to bring in Glennon and draft Watson (or another QB, just for arguments' sake), it serves as a similar hedging your bets thing to the RGIII/Cousins thing in Washington. The rookie would be expected to develop into the starter, but Glennon will be there to play if ....
a) rookie isn't ready
b) rookie is bad
c) Glennon is surprisingly good.
Bearly
Guest
I suspect they go elsewhere at 3 if Glennon is here but you never know. Maybe Pace thinks his QB will be gone and he'd make the move if not. I more suspect we take a QB after one to groom in this scenario. I just hope he stays true to his board even if Glennon is here and moves his QBs up a bit if not.
- Joined:
- Aug 16, 2011
- Posts:
- 9,049
- Liked Posts:
- 5,404
If they are really going after Glennon, I doubt they will pick a qb at 3. It just makes no sense to do that.
- Joined:
- Sep 11, 2014
- Posts:
- 4,514
- Liked Posts:
- 3,017
I believe this as well, but I'm holding out hope that Pace will do right. IF one of the top QB's is his guy that he won't let the Glennon signing effect his draft board. If he settles on some low ceiling limp dick like Peterman than I might just start tuning out this team.
- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 37,894
- Liked Posts:
- 41,321
What if he likes a QB a lot who he thinks needs a year to develop?
didshereallysaythat
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 14, 2011
- Posts:
- 21,420
- Liked Posts:
- 10,200
****. I agree with you here. If they go Glennon, they are not drafting Watson or Trubisky. It just doesn't make sense financially or logically.
****, please let Glennon go somewhere else!
- Joined:
- Sep 11, 2014
- Posts:
- 4,514
- Liked Posts:
- 3,017
If Pace is sold on one of the tier 2 guys as the answer at the QB then I'm also okay with it, won't say I agree with him but will give time to see how it all plays out. Draft a pass rusher or DB at #3 and get his guy at #36. But Peterman is a tier 3 guy and that shit is not satisfactory to this team.