Rise
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 21, 2012
- Posts:
- 8,208
- Liked Posts:
- 7,923
- Location:
- Mom's Basement
Fields is not the guy.
Fields is the guy.
Now we cancel each other out and you’re powerless.
Fields is not the guy.
He can't read defenses.Fields is the guy.
Now we cancel each other out and you’re powerless.
Surprise NFL trade, cut candidates ahead of Tuesday's deadline: Analysis and potential landing spots
Detroit Lions edge rusher James Houston IV and Chicago Bears wide receiver Darnell Mooney are potential trade candidates ahead of Tuesday's deadline.www.pff.com
Bears WR Darnell Mooney: With D.J. Moore and Chase Claypool taking targets away from Mooney, the Bears may look to trade him.
Pretty wild but if they like Scott and don't want to pay Mooney it makes sense.
being a Lions fan, I can understand that, what's your excuseone person disliked it and hes universally recognized as one of the biggest idiots on CCS.
You are too btw.
When Poles traded for Claypool, DJ Moore was no where near the picture. Best case scenario sans Moore is that one of those two guys could step their game up to be a low end WR1 while the other was a good WR2 and you might have drafted a guy at WR3. Yea, now there's no chance you keep both alongside Kmet and Moore. It's just a matter of seeing which one balls out and is worth keeping going forward, which is a good problem to have.I said from day one, no way the bears keep both Mooney and Claypool in their contract years. Only one will be retained and Claypool has the size. I’d take a 4th or a 5th for Mooney aka a sixth round pick. He’s undersized
It's like these people just seem to keep forgetting that developing Justin fucking Fields should be the number one priority especially now going into his 3rd year. If not then you should of just traded Fields and drafted Young or Stroud at #1.So Poles goes out and trades what ends up being the 32nd pick for Claypool, then gets DJ Moore back in the deal for the #1 pick, all because he correctly identifies that his potential franchise QB needs weapons to be successful. Then thinks about trading the only other viable receiver on the roster other than the 2 aforementioned ones.
That makes less than zero sense.
If Fields doesn't work out this year then we could end up with or right around the first pick again because this defense definitely isn't keeping this team in any games.Let's say Fields doesn't work out. That means, bare minimum, BOTH #1 picks next year are being used to get the next QB, why would you start to trade off WR pieces?
He can't read defenses.
But im not though, but great work!being a Lions fan, I can understand that, what's your excuse
Mad? I have no clue what you are asking me. I prefer one player over another player. I don't believe anyone gets mad over these types of things.@Noonthirtyjoe what ails you? why are you mad?
Size, speed, catch radius, clutch. Can run any route. Loved him at ND. I like Mooney too. Want both. Think higher upside with Claypool. IMO.I Notice the usual suspects disliking this
LMFAO, what the hell do you see in Clayshit
Size, speed, catch radius, clutch. Can run any route. Loved him at ND. I like Mooney too. Want both. Think higher upside with Claypool. IMO.
Size, speed, catch radius, clutch. Can run any route. Loved him at ND. I like Mooney too. Want both. Think higher upside with Claypool. IMO.
This isn't true norton.He can't read defenses.