Discus fish salesman
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Mar 31, 2018
- Posts:
- 15,276
- Liked Posts:
- 19,706
2 more interceptions is worse though
didshereallysaythat
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 14, 2011
- Posts:
- 20,928
- Liked Posts:
- 9,825
Let's compare Goff and Love:
TDs:
Love: 12 (2nd)
Goff 8 (12th)
INTs:
Love 6 (60th)
Goff 4 (46th)
YPA:
Love: 7.7 (10th)
Goff 8.9 (1st)
Completion Percentage:
Love: 58.9 (31st)
Goff: 71.1 (3rd)
QB Rating:
Love: 93.7 (16th)
Goff: 105.3 (6th)
I don't like to use yards because they can be heavily skewed by game situation. IE Love got 397 yards against the Vikings with over half of them coming when they had to throw and he racked up well over 50 attempts for the game.
So Goff wins 4 of the 5 stats here. What other ones would be used that are in Love's favor? Sacks? He has 4 to Goff's 9. So maybe that but that might be more a representation of great OL play.
Love is better at explosive plays. He takes more chances. He has a bit of Favre in him although not as strong of an arm obviously but still well above average. Goff plays more conservatively. Both benefit from great play design.
Honestly, it's a toss up who is better. And that is being completely objective as much as possible.
TDs:
Love: 12 (2nd)
Goff 8 (12th)
INTs:
Love 6 (60th)
Goff 4 (46th)
YPA:
Love: 7.7 (10th)
Goff 8.9 (1st)
Completion Percentage:
Love: 58.9 (31st)
Goff: 71.1 (3rd)
QB Rating:
Love: 93.7 (16th)
Goff: 105.3 (6th)
I don't like to use yards because they can be heavily skewed by game situation. IE Love got 397 yards against the Vikings with over half of them coming when they had to throw and he racked up well over 50 attempts for the game.
So Goff wins 4 of the 5 stats here. What other ones would be used that are in Love's favor? Sacks? He has 4 to Goff's 9. So maybe that but that might be more a representation of great OL play.
Love is better at explosive plays. He takes more chances. He has a bit of Favre in him although not as strong of an arm obviously but still well above average. Goff plays more conservatively. Both benefit from great play design.
Honestly, it's a toss up who is better. And that is being completely objective as much as possible.
didshereallysaythat
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 14, 2011
- Posts:
- 20,928
- Liked Posts:
- 9,825
Hey, if he is arguing which is better for your fantasy team, then Love wins hands down here lol.
- Joined:
- Nov 27, 2014
- Posts:
- 18,691
- Liked Posts:
- 4,639
Dumbass tries to say Love statistically is the best QB in the North, then gets his ass handed to him.
Well one thing is for sure, Love has missed the most games. I guess that makes him the biggest pussy QB in the North?
Well one thing is for sure, Love has missed the most games. I guess that makes him the biggest pussy QB in the North?
10veitout
Quack quack 🦆
- Joined:
- Mar 11, 2013
- Posts:
- 4,774
- Liked Posts:
- 345
Not as worse as 4 TDs is better. 4 extra TDs easily makes up for 2 extra INTs.
10veitout
Quack quack 🦆
- Joined:
- Mar 11, 2013
- Posts:
- 4,774
- Liked Posts:
- 345
No. Love has more TD passes, a better TD to INT ratio, more rushing yards, only 200 less passing yards and all this in 1 game less. Its not debatable. Love is way better at scoring, nothing could make up for all of that.
Btw, Love has as strong of an arm as Favre lol. Love's arm talent is and has always been considered on par with Mahomes ever since his pre draft prognostications.
- Joined:
- Jan 4, 2011
- Posts:
- 47,215
- Liked Posts:
- 36,255
- Location:
- Chicago
"not as worse"? do you talk your victims this way before you kill them?
10veitout
Quack quack 🦆
- Joined:
- Mar 11, 2013
- Posts:
- 4,774
- Liked Posts:
- 345
I destroyed your argument. Love has more passing TDs, better TD to INT ratio, more rushing yards, and only 200 less passing yards in 1 less game. This isn't even a conversation.
didshereallysaythat
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 14, 2011
- Posts:
- 20,928
- Liked Posts:
- 9,825
Yeah this is a troll...
- Joined:
- Nov 27, 2014
- Posts:
- 18,691
- Liked Posts:
- 4,639
He has the same TD to INT ratio you dumbass.
Here is one for you, Goff has 4 wins
Love has only two.
Both of the Packers losses has come with Love at QB.
game/set/match
Last edited:
- Joined:
- Jan 4, 2011
- Posts:
- 47,215
- Liked Posts:
- 36,255
- Location:
- Chicago
*losses
- Joined:
- May 12, 2010
- Posts:
- 47,380
- Liked Posts:
- 25,852
AUTISTICS ARE FIGHTING
Canth
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Mar 23, 2016
- Posts:
- 3,622
- Liked Posts:
- 5,187
Ok, last attempt from me anyway for the fucking idiot that doesn't understand how ratios work despite repeated attempts at education.
Ratio - Wikipedia
Key point here: "In mathematics, a ratio shows how many times one number contains another."
So, 12 divided by 6 is 2.
8 divided by 4 is also 2.
128 divided by 64 is also 2.
It's the same fucking ratio you fucking moron.
Goff and Love have the exact same fucking TD:INT ratio.
Yes, Love has thrown more TD's. Just say that. Quit using the word ratio. Take it out of your vocabulary and thought process. You don't understand the term and you look dumber every time you try to use it.
The way you are trying to compare TDs and INTs are a difference or sometimes called differential. That means you subtract one number from another.
In that case, yes, 12-6=6.
8-4=4.
Those are not ratios.
I'm done. If you can't figure this shit out now, then please promise to at least never fucking reproduce.
10veitout
Quack quack 🦆
- Joined:
- Mar 11, 2013
- Posts:
- 4,774
- Liked Posts:
- 345
Wrong. Love has a 12-6 TD to INT ratio, Goff has 8 to 4 TD to INT ratio. Love has 6 more TDs then INTs, Goff only has 4 more TDs then INTs.
Wins are a team stat. Doesnt matter. Not to mention, Love would have won both those games that his backup started.
10veitout
Quack quack 🦆
- Joined:
- Mar 11, 2013
- Posts:
- 4,774
- Liked Posts:
- 345
Ok, last attempt from me anyway for the fucking idiot that doesn't understand how ratios work despite repeated attempts at education.
Ratio - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Key point here: "In mathematics, a ratio shows how many times one number contains another."
So, 12 divided by 6 is 2.
8 divided by 4 is also 2.
128 divided by 64 is also 2.
It's the same fucking ratio you fucking moron.
Goff and Love have the exact same fucking TD:INT ratio.
Yes, Love has thrown more TD's. Just say that. Quit using the word ratio. Take it out of your vocabulary and thought process. You don't understand the term and you look dumber every time you try to use it.
The way you are trying to compare TDs and INTs are a difference or sometimes called differential. That means you subtract one number from another.
In that case, yes, 12-6=6.
8-4=4.
Those are not ratios.
I'm done. If you can't figure this shit out now, then please promise to at least never fucking reproduce.
I said Love has a better TD to INT ratio, as in, he has the more preferable one to have. 6 more TDs then INTs > 4 more TDs then INTs.
- Joined:
- May 12, 2010
- Posts:
- 47,380
- Liked Posts:
- 25,852
Lmfao wut
MikeDitkaPolishSausage
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 12, 2013
- Posts:
- 9,122
- Liked Posts:
- 6,942
- Location:
- Black Rainbow’s Grandma’s house.
As much as I hate this comment because my nephew is autistic, I kinda laughed out loud.
10veitout
Quack quack 🦆
- Joined:
- Mar 11, 2013
- Posts:
- 4,774
- Liked Posts:
- 345
12-6 is a better TD to INT ratio to have then 8-4. Because 6 more TDs then INTs > 4 more TDs then INTs.
Your disagreeing? You'd rather have the guy with only 4 more TDs to INTs?
Discus fish salesman
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Mar 31, 2018
- Posts:
- 15,276
- Liked Posts:
- 19,706
So he has the same td/int ratio then?
- Joined:
- May 12, 2010
- Posts:
- 47,380
- Liked Posts:
- 25,852
Nothing negative was said, but I'd imagine this is how it would go.