NFC North Race Is Taking Shape..

[10veitout]

Okay. So which is better 16 TD 8 Int or 40 TD 30 Int, and you should be banned if you say the latter.

One of those is 2-1 one is 4-3. That isn't comparable lol.

The TD to INT ratio with the biggest ratio difference in favor of TDs is always better. Therefore Love's 12-6 > Goff's 8-4

Are you really saying 4 more TDs then INTs is as good as 6 more TDs to INTs? Lol?

 

[Canth]

Christ. Guys.

One of you is talking a TD-INT ratio. So, in a ratio, yes 8-4, 12-6, 128-64 are all a 2-1 ratio.

Now, the other thing is a TD-INT difference. Full stop. Keep the word ratio out of it. As soon as you add the word ratio, you change the meaning. So, fucking stop doing that.

 

[10veitout]

Christ. Guys.

One of you is talking a TD-INT ratio. So, in a ratio, yes 8-4, 12-6, 128-64 are all a 2-1 ratio.

Now, the other thing is a TD-INT difference. Full stop. Keep the word ratio out of it. As soon as you add the word ratio, you change the meaning. So, fucking stop doing that.

I said Love had a better TD to INT ratio, as in, the more preferable TD to INT ratio to have. He does, with 6 more TDs then INTs, to Goff's 4.

Everyone here except me is saying that all the TD to INT ratios you listed are equally as good.

 

[AuCN]

ratio vs differential.
This is seriously painful to watch play out...

 

[Canth]

I said Love had a better TD to INT ratio, as in, the more preferable TD to INT ratio to have. He does, with 6 more TDs then INTs, to Goff's 4.

Everyone here except me is saying that all the TD to INT ratios you listed are equally as good.

Yes, and you are fucking idiot in doing so because both are 2:1 ratios. The ratio is the same.

What you should be saying is that Love has a better TD to INT difference. There it is +6 vs +4.

 

[AuCN]

Hence why they say (+1, -8, +15, etc) "turnover differential", not "turnover ratio". Words have meanings.

 

[Discus fish salesman]

I said Love had a better TD to INT ratio, as in, the more preferable TD to INT ratio to have. He does, with 6 more TDs then INTs, to Goff's 4.

Everyone here except me is saying that all the TD to INT ratios you listed are equally as good.

No wonder the Asian porn bots steal your money at such an extreme ratio. It's because you are a moron

 

[KittiesKorner]

I said Love had a better TD to INT ratio, as in, the more preferable TD to INT ratio to have. He does, with 6 more TDs then INTs, to Goff's 4.

Everyone here except me is saying that all the TD to INT ratios you listed are equally as good.

I thought you got banned for threatening to kill other posters

 

[Discus fish salesman]

I thought you got banned for threatening to kill other posters

I think it was when he was talking about Asian porn bots worshipping him because he's an incel

 

[KittiesKorner]

I think it was when he was talking about Asian porn bots worshipping him because he's an incel

that would be @Mighty Joe Young and his $136k income, sorry

 

[didshereallysaythat]

Well... that was embarrassing.

And for the record, TD to INT ratio is more commonly used than TD difference when examining QB play.

 

[didshereallysaythat]

Honestly, both Goff and Love look good from a clean pocket. Love has a better arm but Goff is more accurate. When pressured, they both throw ducks tho.

 

[10veitout]

Well... that was embarrassing.

And for the record, TD to INT ratio is more commonly used than TD difference when examining QB play.

When people use TD to INT ratio to judge a QBs play, they are usually judging which TD to INT ratio is preferable to have. Obviously, 12-6 is better then 8-4. 6 more TDs then INTs > 4 more TDs to INTs.

 

[KittiesKorner]

how good is an arm if inaccurate?

 

[10veitout]

Honestly, both Goff and Love look good from a clean pocket. Love has a better arm but Goff is more accurate. When pressured, they both throw ducks tho.

Love scores significantly more then Goff and make significantly more highlight reel throws. Love is statistically a top 5 QB, Goff isn't.

 

[didshereallysaythat]

When people use TD to INT ratio to judge a Was play, they are usually judging which TD to INT ratio is preferable to have. Obviously, 12-6 is better then 8-4. 6 more TDs then INTs > 4 more TDs to INTs.

No they are not.

 

[10veitout]

how good is an arm if inaccurate?

Love was fairly accurate last season. One of the most accurate QBs in the league over the last 8 games. Look at Love's 23' stat line, it is way beyond nearly every season of Goff's career. His (Love) last 8 games was incredible.

 

[10veitout]

No they are not.

Yes they are lol

 

[didshereallysaythat]

Yes they are lol

You are saying 12-6 is better than 8-4 when in reality, they are both 2-1 ratio. That is simple math.

Is it BETTER to have 12-6 vs 8-4? That is subjective without doing a deeper dive and evaluating based on how valuable the TDs were and detrimental the Interceptions were. If it was a simple as counting the net of the two, then as another posted said, 40-30 would be better than 12-6 or 8-4. Because 10 is greater than 6 and 4. But anyone that watches football will tell you that a 40-30 season likely meant that a lot of those turnovers would end up being back breakers that lost games.

 

[10veitout]

You are saying 12-6 is better than 8-4 when in reality, they are both 2-1 ratio. That is simple math.

Is it BETTER to have 12-6 vs 8-4? That is subjective without doing a deeper dive and evaluating based on how valuable the TDs were and detrimental the Interceptions were. If it was a simple as counting the net of the two, then as another posted said, 40-30 would be better than 12-6 or 8-4. Because 10 is greater than 6 and 4. But anyone that watches football will tell you that a 40-30 season likely meant that a lot of those turnovers would end up being back breakers that lost games.

40-30 is a 4-3 ratio. Not comparable.

12-6 and 8-4 are both 2-1 ratios. But one has 4 more TDs to only 2 more INTs. Therefore, the former is indisputably better then the latter. 4 additional TDs is obviously worth two additional INTs.