- Joined:
- Aug 21, 2012
- Posts:
- 29,522
- Liked Posts:
- 24,054
- Location:
- USA
who gives a fuck about grades....the football field is the only thing that matters...
In this draft, completely incorrect IMOIf the Bears would have taken Pryor they would have gotten an A+. But it's easier to find a great safety than a great corner so I understand the pick. If Donald fell to us our safety position would still look the same. Bears took the best player available. Bears will take a safety later on and this pick will look a lot better to everyone when they do. Kyle Fuller is a stud but I understand why people don't like the choice over Pryor. My top two must gets were Donald and Pryor but I am not upset at all with Fuller.
Fuller + safety later > Pryor + corner later
A top notch corner is A MILLION times more important than a top notch safety. It is simply a more important position.
Actually he has plus grades in all phases except blocking. He does have really low grades as a blocker.
Weaknesses: Dropped nearly 12 percent of the passes thrown his way, an unexpectedly high number that means he’ll leave folks frustrated from time to time. By his own admission, must improve as a run blocker, especially if the team that drafts him wants to use him as a No. 1 tight end. Should be better than he is making grabs in traffic, which could help explain to some extent his very low TD total. Will he be OK with playing a complementary role?
Again, it fits in with 'needs' vs wants. We want a better safety; we needed the corner. The needs correspond with what we HAVE now... we need to USE what we have now... Tillman, Jennings... experienced vets who can groom this QUALITY pick.
This is, I believe, the key to the pick.
Fuller isn't a top notch corner. And this pick isn't occurring in a vacuum. The hell are you talking about?
Yes he is. He was rated the best DB by several analysts. So were others too but Emery liked this one the best and he knows more about it than you.
LOL what?
You have need/want completely flipped.
I have.Watch his tape.
He absolutely is not. He's a nice player. A good pick. He's not a shutdown CB. He's not a top notch CB at this point.He is a top notch player.
True dat. And why we got A-... still, our pick is still 'less than' theirs, and I'm not sure it deserves to be.
Well, I didn't think I did. I'll try again. I'm a Stones fan, so I digress into song often... cue "Can't always get what you want"...
Wanted, and subsequently, didn't get 'THE' Safety. If we had, I would have been happy. I liked Pryor and Haha, in that order. But, no. The comments on Conte/Mundy (now -- Wright earlier) were that they suffered through the horrendously pourous front four and our 'transitioning' LBs. With that shored up (see free agency for details -- subjective opinions again, but still...), the 'word' was that our safeties were 'servicable'.
Needed... best player availble given personel and system. Fuller 'fills' this need. Our personel, Tillman, Jennings, in particular, dictate that their veteran leadership will be exactly what Fuller, a Bear prototype CB of the Mike Brown kin, will NEED.
There was no LOL intended there. I tried to make funny posts earlier, but this one was straight up.
Cheers.
I have.
He absolutely is not. He's a nice player. A good pick. He's not a shutdown CB. He's not a top notch CB at this point.
Stahp.
I'm not even saying the pick was "screwed up". Don't mistake me. All I'm saying is that people proposing Fuller as a "top notch" NFL CB aren't being truthful with themselves.Well this is depressing if true we really screwed up. If fuller is not a top notch #1 secondary contributor then emery failed.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
:andruw:And I have watched it to and think he is better than any defensive back. The only player that I think is better at coverage skills is Dennard. But Dennard is not as versatile as Fuller.
IMO, Fuller us better at safety even than Dix is, and that is not even his main position. And I am so glad that our GM agrees with me instead of you.