Eh, they know the language. They pretend not to when its convenient. Try to screw them on money and see how fast they comprehend.
Actually happened to my bro. A couple of latinos knocked their truck into his car and pretended to not understand english. A quick call to the INS with a licence plate rectified the situation.
Still, I think this is more the exception than the norm. Given the hunge anti-immigrant sentiment pervasive in the states now, coming off as if you don't speak english could very well unwanted attention from the INS--whether your legal or not.
A couple questions:
As an immigrant to a new country should you be expected to learn the language? Or is that an unrealistic or outdated expectation?
How long should it take? 1 year? 5 Years? 10 Years?
I would argue you should learn the language of whatever country you move to at some point. Native fluency is not required. But a working proficiency would do. In my book 5 years is long enough if you're making a legit effort. If you've lived in a place for 10, 15 years or more and you still don't know how to communicate then you're just not making an effort IMO.
Thoughts?
I can't speak for most, but my wife passed the Oxford Fluency exam (british) in High School and passed the TOEFL (american) twice. So, that wasn't an issue (It also helped that her high school english teacher hailed from Red Deer, and was not a native Slovak fluent in English). On the converse side, if I'm ever going to a place where I don't have a working grasp of the language (or a guide who's a native speaker or fluent), I always carry a phrasebook. The last time my in-laws visited, they did the same--carried a phrasebook.
The problem is that the law in the US as I know it's defined does not have an "official" language. English just kinda settled in as the default. As such, locale dominates. IMHO though, whatever's dominant in the locale is what an immigrant should learn. Since for the bulk of the US it's english, it should be English. Even so, fluency may not be requred, but enough of a grasp that you could get by should be a given.
It is very distracting, my daughters school won't do the smaller classrooms and the school suffers for it. Schools are running on a thread as it is,not enough money for that.
Of course, who wants to shell out more taxes? It's not like the money can be reallocated with all of the other programs having a vise-grip on their slice of the pie.