The problem we've always said, RK, with Bolly on 2nd line is he has a tendency to disappear there. For some reason he doesn't pay with the same intensity, IMO, on the 2nd line.
Books, I think Brooksy would take a 3-5 yr contract in the 3.5 to 3.8 range, I honestly dont think he gets 4....unless it is from one of the teams that HAS to spend to hit the CAP floor.
More nonsense about Bolland.
For the record, I'd prefer Bolland slotted with on the 3rd line as a checking center.
Three years ago, he centered Ladd and Havlat and that was hardly the 3rd line. A case could be made his line was the best performing line for the Hawks in the playoffs. Two years ago, it was Versteeg and Ladd. Last season it was Pisani to start and Bickell joined them as the season progressed. Shortly after Pisani went down in LA, Hossa moved with Bickell and Bolland. That line tore it up for a couple of weeks until Bolland was concussed. After Bolland was injured, Bickell disappeared. Then there was the Frolik thing in this past playoffs.
The constant with Bolland is that he has almost always gone up against the oppositions top line whether his wingers were Ladd, Havlat, Versteeg, Bickell, Pisani, Hossa, or Frolik. I'm guessing he had more regular wingers than Toews and Sharp combined.
Is the health of Bolland and the lack of depth at center a concern? Absolutely. But revisionist history on "chemistry with Hossa" or "Bolland's play on the 2nd line" does not move the conversation in the proper direction. At least in my not so humble opinion.