*** OFFICAIL *** 2022 NFL DRAFT IGT - Round 4-7 || 4/30 @ 11:00AM - ESPN

[Kurtosis]

**** the offense apparently? It has to be addressed at some point.

I hate to overreact, but if they’re going to be the same old Bears (i.e. eek out low scoring wins when they happen to actually win) I’m going to just pick up extra Sunday shifts this season.

 

[knoxville7]

Lmao, another defensive player. Who is Justin Fields going to throw to this year?

The other team

 

[IBleedBearsBlood]

Good player but I would not have doubled down in the secondary when we need a WR and O Line.

We need everything.

 

[MDB111™]

Lmao, another defensive player. Who is Justin Fields going to throw to this year?

I think Kyler Gordon plays for both teams

 

[FozzyBear]

Gordon I understood, this pick was confusing. He better be honey badger level good or what a waste.

Bye EJ 2023

 

[vabearsfan15]

Was Brisker really the BPA on the board?...not sure on him, but kinda disappointed we didn't trade down.

Now we have pick #71 to address OL or WR and going to end up relying on a 5th or 6th rounder for the other..

 

[Pretzel Logic]

Guess it's all about how they view the board and the talent on it.

Pickens must have done something terrible to someone's cornflakes.

 

[Anytime23]

WR is a huge need who TF is Fields going to throw to?!?

the other team or the ground.

 

[Bort]

Brisker is a good value there. It’s not a bad pick, and again Poles deserves credit for not reaching for a WR when there isn’t a good value WR on the board. I just don’t understand passing on Dean.

 

[doctorbear]

**** the offense apparently? It has to be addressed at some point.

I hate to overreact, but if they’re going to be the same old Bears I’m going to just pick up extra Sunday shifts this season.

Just watch red zone all year

 

[I Just Want To Read]

This seems like an idiotic strategy.

 

[Britbuffguy]

This organization will never learn! Seriously I wonder how they will ever change

So, you wanted them to reach for a player that may barely be better than someone they can get in the 3rd?

 

[knoxville7]

Was Brisker really the BPA on the board?...not sure on him, but kinda disappointed we didn't trade down.

Now we have pick #71 to address OL or WR and going to end up relying on a 5th or 6th rounder for the other..

Bodes well for my cade mays prediction

 

[MikeDitkaPolishSausage]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1498708356021825545

Maybe they are thinking Mooney is that guy?? IDK

 

[and 69 others]

Brisker is a good value there. It’s not a bad pick, and again Poles deserves credit for not reaching for a WR when there isn’t a good value WR on the board. I just don’t understand passing on Dean.

It’s not a good value if there are much better value picks out there though.

At least he’s got a high floor.

 

[Briggs is GOAT]

the other team or the ground.

...Darnell Mooney is the #1 and no clearly defined #2 lol.

 

[ZOMBIE@CTESPN]

So, you wanted them to reach for a player that may barely be better than someone they can get in the 3rd?

Safety is a garbage investment.

 

[Rise]

You win in da trenches! Picks two secondary guys for the failed
Cover who defense.

 

[DeerBrinker34]

The other team

Don't have to throw to anyone if you're being sacked 200 times.

 

[wazzupi]

Brisker is a good value there. It’s not a bad pick, and again Poles deserves credit for not reaching for a WR when there isn’t a good value WR on the board. I just don’t understand passing on Dean.

I agree with this