- Joined:
- Jun 19, 2011
- Posts:
- 32,905
- Liked Posts:
- 26,050
I would say in that picture, more like a railroad car. :-DDude looks like a freaking tank, jesus.
you are a cancer to these forumsAre you crying?
Peppers for sure. Don't get me wrong, Kreutz was a great player when not going against guys named Stubblefield, but Peppers was a rare defensive end who played the run as well as the pass.
I admit I'm slightly nervous about how he's going to perform against speed rushers.Pro bowl conversation for me.
Takes literally 10 seconds to prove you are a liar. This is a just a small sampling of your bitching about dislikes from half of CCS.
View attachment 29715View attachment 29716View attachment 29717
The addition of Tonyan alone is already going to make an appreciable difference in the passing game in two TE sets.
It's what your mother's egg should have done when that mentally deficient sperm attempted to burrow itself ( or for you, it self) inside of it.Actually, if you want a little education, the proper term would be "throwback".
I understand completely. I get unreasonably irritated by people who use "to beg the question" incorrectly.Who won? Which side were you in? I’m guessing my side which is correct- couldn’t care less.
I admit that could care less is easier to say but it’s incorrect. Normally I don’t care, but he’s fun to correct.
I have a few pet peeves. Acrossed isn’t a word, it’s just across
Irregardless is not a word.
Then, than and they’re, their and there, two, to and too.
Heightth isn’t a word but width is.
I'm not. He excels at getting off the snap and has such a wide frame that it makes getting around him so difficult.I admit I'm slightly nervous about how he's going to perform against speed rushers.
Also applies to nocockneto
I could care less about you're being fussy about there use age irregardless of they're intent.Who won? Which side were you in? I’m guessing my side which is correct- couldn’t care less.
I admit that could care less is easier to say but it’s incorrect. Normally I don’t care, but he’s fun to correct.
I have a few pet peeves. Acrossed isn’t a word, it’s just across
Irregardless is not a word.
Then, than and they’re, their and there, two, to and too.
Heightth isn’t a word but width is.
We knew he wasn't the sharpest pencil in the box when drafted and that it would take a year to even be able to evaluate him as a wide out.WR coach Tolbert on VeeJayJay
“HE’S GOT A LOT MORE, I GUESS, JUICE,” TOLBERT SAID. “A LITTLE MORE PEP IN HIS STEP. I SAY THAT, AND EVERYBODY KNOWS HE’S THE FASTEST GUY IN THE ROOM. BUT WHEN HE GETS OUT THERE, HE HEARS THE PLAY NOW, HE LINES UP REALLY FAST AND KNOWS WHAT HE’S DOING. I THINK IT’S THE CONFIDENCE IN KNOWING WHAT TO DO, BECAUSE HE WOULD TELL YOU HIMSELF, LAST YEAR HE WAS LIKE A DEER IN THE HEADLIGHTS A LOT OF THE TIMES.
“NOW HE KNOWS WHAT TO DO, HE ANSWERS ALL THE QUESTIONS IN THE MEETINGS, THEN HE GETS ONTO THE FIELD AND KNOWS HOW TO GO OUT THERE AND EXECUTE IT. I THINK, AGAIN, BEING A YEAR IN THE SYSTEM HAS HELPED HIM TREMENDOUSLY. PROBABLY HELPED HIM MORE THAN ANYBODY IN THE ROOM.”
Fields has some of the smoothest speed I've ever seen. Dude just glides past people.
I mean, really? When I pull a boner, I say oops, got me and fucking move on. You can tell how insecure some posters are by how big a pile they make out of silly shit.You don't care less? So you care more then? You really are incredibly dumb
By someone that probably submits the highest dislike to like reactions on this board.Takes literally 10 seconds to prove you are a liar. This is a just a small sampling of your bitching about dislikes from half of CCS.
View attachment 29715View attachment 29716View attachment 29717
It's been upgraded for this system. Roquan is also better off where he's at so win/win.Most people rate Roquan above Edmunds. Questionable whether the position has been "upgraded."
Reminds me of watching Matt Thornton pitch. Dude looked like he was playing catch with his kid and hitting 100 on the radar.Fields has some of the smoothest speed I've ever seen. Dude just glides past people.
While I agree with the overall sentiment here, VJJ is not just another guy and a boom or bust type. A bit of an enigma that could be both those in the same year depending on how used.So I disagree on calling the WR room 'crowded'. ESB, Pettis and Velus are JAGs (just another guy), they're nothing special. I'd be disappointed if Scott didn't win the WR #4 spot based on who his competition is. Aside from continuity, I didn't see anything from any of those guys indicating they should be on the team for 2023. My opinion obviously doesn't matter but it is very funny to see them hyped up as difficult competition. Just catch the balls you should and you're auto #4 because those three routinely fail at catching the easily catchable passes.