Did you also advocate for trading for Watson? If so I stand corrected that would be your stupidest take ever.
Not surprised you don't remember that you argued that it was an advantage to be a backup in college because he could work on his fundamentals instead of preparing for games. Just proof you just talk out of your ass to talk quite often.
So the Bears should consider picking up a guy off waivers that has been a problem in the past because he didn't just put hands on a woman for no reason, he did it because she called him a mean name. Got it.
I didn't advocate signing Winfrey. I stated what the cost would be to the Bears. I also made it quite clear there is no guaranteed money so you could easily cut him if the allegations are true.
You said I said Mitch had the advantage over Watson. I did not say that. I said strictly from the perspective of working on mechanics it is easier to do so if you are not playing. That does not mean Mitch has the advantage or is better than Watson as I would never say that because I always had Watson over Trubisky despite being a Tar Heel. I watched all of Mitch's starts and almost half of them in person as I have season tickets. I was shocked when people had him as a first round pick.
And no, I clearly said that doesn't justify what he did. I am pointing out the woman's story is not 100% true. She says he went crazy for no reason. That is not true. That is it. Has nothing to do with whether we should sign him or not.
