the debate with fields is his passing ability nobody has questioned his running ability.
Fields made the top 100 because of his running ability not his passing ability.
You want to talk about how great of a runner he is? I 100% agree he has elite running skills. But when I'm talking about his shortcomings as a passer, bringing up his running ability is not a logical point to make because it has nothing to do with his shortcomings that are being debated.
Unless people are trying to make the point is it doesn't matter how bad of a passer he is because his running ability makes up for that? But the problem with this argument is there is a position on the team for players that are great runners and bad passers.. its called a RB.. Is that what you guys are suggesting? move him to RB?
@msadows is this what you are saying?