rawdawg
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Apr 28, 2013
- Posts:
- 8,013
- Liked Posts:
- 6,460
No, my evidence is that he won't be drafted as high as they were in a considerably weaker draft. My evidence is he does not have the traits they do. My evidence is he does not have the versatility they do. My evidence is they both put up OROY worthy numbers (1 won it) while projecting that JSN won't do that. My evidence is the production argument is BS because he only outproduced them because he played 2 more games than they did. And the 2 games he didn't have them, he put up astronomical numbers which skewed the numbers in his favor. I have said all these things, it's not just "because I said so". You are completely misrepresenting me and ignoring things I have said.Yeah no. You are suggesting Olave and Wilson are lying providing no evidence to back that assertion beyond you said so. What people are saying is that considering JSN outproduced all of them in 2021, it is entirely possibly and more likely that they truly think this guy who is 2 years younger than them is actually better. The dude came in as a 19 year old and outperformed 2 first rounders that were 21.
So we aren't just basing it on production. We are basing it on what Wilson and Olave said, the fact he outperformed them and the fact he is a full 2 years younger than them and thus may still have untapped potential. You are claiming Wilson and Olave are lying simply because it fits what you want to believe. You have absolutely no evidence to support that beyond your own opinion.
Waddle again was drafted in a Covid year. Teams made allowances for him and Chase due to Covid because there were a **** ton of players that played reduced games or opted out that year. That is not the same as a player getting injured and then putting up 43 yards in a season where there aren't a **** ton of other players doing the same. And yes if he puts up big numbers at the combine then his stock will improve which is also a reason why you claiming Olave and Wilson are lying doesn't make any sense. You don't know the kid. They see him in practice and the gym for 2 years. They saw him outproduce them while being 2 years younger. So their opinion is more believable than yours because they have better info on the kid that you do.
The fact they think he is better doesn't mean he actually is as they could simply be wrong but jumping thru all these hoops to claim they are lying when there is plenty of evidence to support their opinion is just strange. If you think he isn't good then just say that. No need to claim people are lying just to make your opinion appear more valid.
Waddle missing time had nothing to do with Covid though, and everything to do with being injured.
And I started off with I think they are lying. I didn't try to prove my opinion until it was challenged. You could have just left my comment alone and not said shit. But here we are. Aren't you jumping thru those same hoops to prove they aren't lying?