dabears70
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Dec 31, 2013
- Posts:
- 35,818
- Liked Posts:
- 11,089
- Location:
- Orlando
Boom.I've had D.Jones as my guy all along just because i never thought we were going to pay D.Payne the kind of price many thought he would get so i'm more than fine with bringing him in to play 3T and love the idea of what W.Anderson can bring. I could get behind that and if Key doesn't play up to keeping him for that 2nd year then we can let him walk and replace him in 2024.
Hopefully. Still worried about A.Key.Boom.
A DL of Key-Tomlinson-Jones-Anderson is legit AF
Wouldn’t a rookie also serve as competition and motivation? Not to mention being in a contract year?
Bringing In a Skilled Veteran Receiver
Analysis: If the Bears want to bring the best out of Chase Claypool, maybe a little competition from a veteran free agent acquisition could do it.
Hopefully. Still worried about A.Key.
True but i think bringing in a vet on a 1 year cheap deal might be good for all of the offense, especially the WR's.Wouldn’t a rookie also serve as competition and motivation? Not to mention being in a contract year?
Very good? I have yet to see that but hope you're right if we do actually sign him.Worry not. Especially if he came on a 1-2 yr deal. He’s a very good, well rounded player.
A matter of semantics, really. Is he pro bowl good? No. But he’s a good football player who is ascendingVery good? I have yet to see that but hope you're right if we do actually sign him.
Please no. I love Monty but he’s just too slow.
I really don’t see Anderson making it to #4 unless Arizona trades down to a QB needy team.Dre’Mont Jones, Dalvin Tomlinson and Key in FA for the DL
Trade down with Indy and select Anderson at 4. Problem solved ?
Maybe, maybe not. Wouldn’t surprise me either wayI really don’t see Anderson making it to #4 unless Arizona trades down to a QB needy team.
Love the usage of the excel style depth chart. Can you do one for the D? I’m a visual learnerso your saying the possibility of Mooney and Claypool outside, Woods in the slot, EQ as 4th WR/sub on the outside, Jones as the Gimmick, Kmet and possibly Saquon(prefer Gibbs in the draft, but Bears gotta spend) as possible targets for Fields
Could be a good start.
View attachment 26494
Bullshit. We were already told by someone else that the Packers are done with Rodgers.
I'm not even sure its average, which is quite sad when you consider the substantial cost in draft picks and money it will cost to assemble.Boom.
A DL of Key-Tomlinson-Jones-Anderson is legit AF
Good. Rodgers heavy ass contract anchor is barely keeping that ship afloat. Love will request a trade and his value is a 2nd rnd pick at best, Packers will have to draft another 1st rnd QB in 2024.