**OFFICAIL** Bears 2024 Regular Season News & Schleisse - FTO Preferred - No ALTS! Derailing Is Discouraged!

94SupraTT

Spoilers!
Donator
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
2,185
Liked Posts:
1,572
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Bears
I don't think it is nonsense at all. He is undersized as a 4-3 DE. That is simply reality. DEs his size typically do struggle against the run as he is closer in size to Yannick who clearly struggles against the run due to his size. Having said that, I think Anderson can still play in a 4-3 as a DE but he is clearly not the ideal fit. You would generally want a guy in the 265-280 range in a Cover 2 4-3 Defense.
Eberflus runs more Cover 3 than he does Cover 2. He also likes to zone match. The Bears are not a "Cover 2" team. They run it, as does every defense in the NFL. The same applies regarding being that we still will be running a 4-3 base. You could argue that we are a 4-2-5 team (I think 4-3 nickel is a misnomer in today's NFL). Teams line up in 4-2-5 as a base and nickel corners are no longer situational, they are the base D. In 2021, 3 teams lined up in base more than 50% of the time, the Steelers, the Dolphins, and Chiefs everyone else lined up in nickel more. Buffalo for example lined up 4-2-5 92% of the time. Indy lined up 4-2-5 78% of the time. I'd argue that Eberflus would prefer a smaller DE so he can drop him into coverage and disguise things more without the DE being a HUGE liability in coverage. Furthermore, the highest anyone lined up in a "base" defense was 38% in 2021.

 

rawdawg

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 28, 2013
Posts:
8,013
Liked Posts:
6,460
Hmm not sure I would agree there. He is a little bigger than Myles Garrett and a little smaller than JJ Watt. Peppers also had a similar build when he played for us. He is a LE that can move inside and play some 3T.
It's more of a body type than size thing. But he doesn't have the first step quickness or bend of those guys. Peppers, Garrett and Watt are as big of freaks as athletes as the world has ever seen. I just don't see Wilson as that type, though it remains to be seen at the combine. I wouldn't hate the pick, just would be weary of taking him top 5, and no chance I take him over Anderson, fit be damned.
 

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
63,191
Liked Posts:
40,333
Eberflus runs more Cover 3 than he does Cover 2. He also likes to zone match. The Bears are not a "Cover 2" team. They run it, as does every defense in the NFL. The same applies regarding being that we still will be running a 4-3 base. You could argue that we are a 4-2-5 team (I think 4-3 nickel is a misnomer in today's NFL). Teams line up in 4-2-5 as a base and nickel corners are no longer situational, they are the base D. In 2021, 3 teams lined up in base more than 50% of the time, the Steelers, the Dolphins, and Chiefs everyone else lined up in nickel more. Buffalo for example lined up 4-2-5 92% of the time. Indy lined up 4-2-5 78% of the time. I'd argue that Eberflus would prefer a smaller DE so he can drop him into coverage and disguise things more without the DE being a HUGE liability in coverage. Furthermore, the highest anyone lined up in a "base" defense was 38% in 2021.



If you listen to Flus, he is describing a Cover 2. No Cover 2 team plays Cover 2 all the time or even a majority of the time but that is his background as he trained under Marinelli.

In any event, the Bears aren't dropping DEs in coverage as they rarely blitz so have to get pressure with the 4 DL. You drop DEs in coverage more in a 3-4. Flus blitzed like 18% of the time last year and that was with the worst pass rush in the NFL.

It is also the case that if you are playing nickel or dime 80% of the time like the Bears your DEs better hold up against the run because you have one less LB and an extra DB out there. Anderson at RE would have the NB covering the slot so can't have a weak run defender at RE who then is being backed up by a smaller DB. Teams would just punish you by running off the RE all game.

Now again, it is entirely possible Anderson ends up being stout against the run but concerns over his size is legit as that is really the only knock on him. He is more of a 3-4 LB that can play 4-3 end.
 

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
63,191
Liked Posts:
40,333
It's more of a body type than size thing. But he doesn't have the first step quickness or bend of those guys. Peppers, Garrett and Watt are as big of freaks as athletes as the world has ever seen. I just don't see Wilson as that type, though it remains to be seen at the combine. I wouldn't hate the pick, just would be weary of taking him top 5, and no chance I take him over Anderson, fit be damned.

I would have to see his combine numbers before I conclude on his first step quickness.
 

dentfan

No gods! No Masters!
Joined:
Apr 28, 2013
Posts:
5,330
Liked Posts:
4,539
This is a textbook case of the groupthink idiocy running drafts right now. He trades back twice to end up with a too short arms, slow-footed, potential G. Are you fucking kidding me? And people are applauding this shit? Get the **** out of here. The worst part is that motherfuckers are going go on about "oh the value". **** that. This was fucking wasted pick. I fucking can't.
 

HeHateMe

He/Himz/Hiz
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
59,260
Liked Posts:
52,200
This is a textbook case of the groupthink idiocy running drafts right now. He trades back twice to end up with a too short arms, slow-footed, potential G. Are you fucking kidding me? And people are applauding this shit? Get the **** out of here. The worst part is that motherfuckers are going go on about "oh the value". **** that. This was fucking wasted pick. I fucking can't.
These beat writers should honestly look at a few of our mocks.
 

dentfan

No gods! No Masters!
Joined:
Apr 28, 2013
Posts:
5,330
Liked Posts:
4,539
You said it - He can play in a 4-3. Whether he’s an “ideal” fit is irrelevant. He can be a game wrecker there. Hes very good against the run at Bama, and while the competition will be bigger in the NFL, he’s not that much difference in size than Mack during his earlier years who was awesome playing 4-3 end. I’d guess Anderson can prob pack on another 10 lbs as well.
If we draft him, I hope you prove me wrong. I see him as an undersized OLB for a 3-4.
 

rawdawg

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 28, 2013
Posts:
8,013
Liked Posts:
6,460
Yeah I guess I am saying I am not convinced he can be a game wrecker in a 4-3. Mack is incredibly strong for his size and has always had a good mix of power and speed. Not sure I view Anderson in the same vein. He is more of a speed rusher at the NFL level. It is not enough for me to not draft him if he is there but I think the concerns about his size are legit.
Anderson is interesting, because he's the rare college prospect that is coming to the league with pretty polished hands. He's very savvy. He uses a bunch of different pass rush moves and has plenty of counters. But he's kind of a jack of all trades, master of none type. He doesn't have Parsons level speed. He doesn't have Mack's strength. He doesn't have Von Miller's bend. But I think he's a high level pass rusher that does everything well enough to have double digit sack upside.
 

Enasic

Who are the brain police?
Joined:
Mar 17, 2014
Posts:
14,287
Liked Posts:
10,090
Yeah I guess I am saying I am not convinced he can be a game wrecker in a 4-3. Mack is incredibly strong for his size and has always had a good mix of power and speed. Not sure I view Anderson in the same vein. He is more of a speed rusher at the NFL level. It is not enough for me to not draft him if he is there but I think the concerns about his size are legit.
Anderson is very strong for his size as well, like Mack. It’s ok to have concerns…there should be concerns for every single prospect drafted….but you seem to agree that he can play 4-3 end and that you would still draft him despite your concerns so yeah….
 

bamainatlanta

You wake him up, you keep him up
Staff member
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '22
Joined:
Aug 10, 2013
Posts:
38,980
Liked Posts:
36,244
Location:
Cumming
Give me Ngakoue over Key.

He's averaged about 8 sacks per season over his career. Key doesn't have one season with 8 sacks.
Yes but why don’t teams want Yannick long term though?
 

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
63,191
Liked Posts:
40,333
Anderson is interesting, because he's the rare college prospect that is coming to the league with pretty polished hands. He's very savvy. He uses a bunch of different pass rush moves and has plenty of counters. But he's kind of a jack of all trades, master of none type. He doesn't have Parsons level speed. He doesn't have Mack's strength. He doesn't have Von Miller's bend. But I think he's a high level pass rusher that does everything well enough to have double digit sack upside.

Agreed. The concern with Anderson is really not his pass rush. It is whether he can hold up at DE in a 4-3 in the run game and whether doing so will limit his effectiveness pass rush wise.
 

Top