- Joined:
- Apr 17, 2010
- Posts:
- 38,012
- Liked Posts:
- 36,808
I think he looked good once on what i think was a jet sweep for a TD? Whats worse, a 2nd round pick for Watson(a top 10 WR in TDs) or a 3rd round pick for Velus(guy who cant even get snaps)? Watson looks like a guy who can be a starting WR for years to come. He literally has as many TDs as VJ has touches. Velus Jones doesnt look like he should even be lining up at WR.No, Watson isn't a bust. Same way Velus can't be called a bust, yet. Though Watson cost way more in draft capital and was chosen much higher so he has more expectations.
Can we agree Velus has looked good at times with the ball in his hands and his speed is on display?
This is a 25 year old player who was supposed to not need as much development because of his experience. The Bears needed WRs and he was the "wide receiver" drafted in day 2. This isn't a throwaway pick. Its too early to call anyone a bust but thus far Velus screams bust.
Watson 469 total yards and 9 TDs
Velus Jones 72 total yards and 1 TD
His rushing stats appear before his receiving stats, thats how much of an impact he's made as a receiver. Matt Spiegel said it best, he looks like a complete scouting failure.