I read it as him trying to validate his statement, " Building a top D has never been a problem for Bears GMs" by throwing in a 5 year qualifier so despite the Emery years the Bears mystic ability to have a top year carries on. As if Emery's picks eventually contributed.
Doesn't believing , " Building a top D has never been a problem for Bears GMs," mean you also have to believe a Bears GM will never be able to find a QB or build a top 10 offense.
I mean it's the team history not the GM that determines this fate, apparently.