TL1961
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Apr 24, 2013
- Posts:
- 36,030
- Liked Posts:
- 19,897
Are you sure about that, Clark?They certainly didn't acquire him to play LT but he far from stunk there.
Last edited:
Are you sure about that, Clark?They certainly didn't acquire him to play LT but he far from stunk there.
I think those are the odds of Carter going exactly three. Campbell going four assumes Carter went two or three.It’s weird to me that current betting odds are
-950 Hunter is 2
-600 Abdul is 3
-950 Campbell is 4
Not sure if I’m missing it, but 4 doesn’t seem like it can be more confident than 3. If Abdul doesn’t go 3, then he’s for sure going 4… so can’t be -950 on Campbell. Seems off.
If that was the issue, then Hunter wouldn’t be such a lock to go 2, according to the odds.I think those are the odds of Carter going exactly three. Campbell going four assumes Carter went two or three.
I mean if I only watched the SB I night believe that. But if I watched the rest of the season I'd know he stabilized the OL when they moved him to LTAre you sure about that, Clark?
Personally, I’m taking Green, though unfortunately I see the Bears taking Warren. Kmet has little guaranteed $$ after this year and they’ll bring Warren along to be a full chess piece next year.
So did Jalen Hurts lead them to a SB victory or nah? You still gonna double down on that?No shyte Sherlock. Congratulations on remembering that fact from @bamainatlanta who has hammered it home to everyone on this board over the past year. Remarkably that fuckup didn't keep them from winning one of two Super Bowl appearances.
What if you relied on stats vs your eyes watching some plays?I mean if I only watched the SB I night believe that. But if I watched the rest of the season I'd know he stabilized the OL when they moved him to LT
That's fine. We obviously disagree on his value at LT for KC. The LT spot was a black hole and he helped stabilize it for them in season and was part of a functional offense that helped them make the SB and beat a very good Buffalo team en route.What if you relied on stats vs your eyes watching some plays?
He rated poorly at T.
I am very happy to have him and am not trying to be critical of him. I was responding more to the notion the Bears would view him as LT which I can’t imagine.That's fine. We obviously disagree on his value at LT for KC. The LT spot was a black hole and he helped stabilize it for them in season and was part of a functional offense that helped them make the SB and beat a very good Buffalo team en route.
Obviously ideally he would've been elite at LG with a different LT playing well. But he was important for their success at LT.
Nope. That is exactly what those bets mean, namely pick which guy who goes at that specific draft position (4 or 2, or whatever…).If that was the issue, then Hunter wouldn’t be such a lock to go 2, according to the odds.
Imagine being a coach that took bucky Irving in the 4th and got a monster season. Taking over a disastrous roster and taking an rb at 5.Lmao the Jags taking Jeanty at #5 would be a typical stupid Jags move. Morons.