- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 45,500
- Liked Posts:
- 55,116
He has both Jeanty and Warren potentially being there for the Bears
Interesting how Adam follows Danes board and goes with Conerly ahead of Banks.
Has he ever been mocked before Banks?
The top 7 seem pretty locked in imo.
Jahns: Josh Conerly Jr., OT, Oregon
Here’s how I see the first nine picks playing out:
1. Titans: Cam Ward, QB, Miami
2. Browns: Travis Hunter, WR/CB, Colorado
3. Giants: Abdul Carter, DE, Penn State
4. Patriots: Will Campbell, OT, LSU
5. Jaguars: Mason Graham, DT, Jaguars
6. Raiders: Ashton Jeanty, RB, Boise State
7. Jets: Armand Membou, OT, Missouri
8. Panthers: Jalon Walker, Edge, Georgia
9. Saints: Shedeur Sanders, QB, Colorado
Good lord those mocks are terribleFishbain and Jahns released their latest mock drafts this morning at The Athletic. They’re thinking like me at 10. Get a LT and Conerly could be an option if Banks is gone. Jahns selected him with Banks on the board.
Fishbain's mock draft 3.0
1-10
Kelvin Banks Jr.
OL
Texas
2-39
Kaleb Johnson
RB
Iowa
2-41
Carson Schwesinger - I hate this pick!
LB
UCLA
3-72
Harold Fannin Jr.
TE
Bowling Green
5-148
Fadil Diggs
edge
Syracuse
7-233
Esa Pole
OT
Washington State
7-240
Keondre Jackson
S
Illinois State
Jahns' mock draft 3.0
1-10
Josh Conerly Jr.
OT
Oregon
2-39
Mason Taylor
TE
LSU
2-41
Jaylin Noel
WR
Iowa State
3-72
Sai'vion Jones
DE
LSU
5-158
Brashard Smith
RB
SMU
7-233
Zah Frazier
CB
Texas-San Antonio
7-240
Addison West - He’s from Cary Grove
OL
Western Michigan
![]()
Bears mock draft 3.0: Offensive tackle, tight end, running back or edge at No. 10?
Our final Bears mock draft assumes that Will Campbell, Ashton Jeanty and Mason Graham will all be gone before the 10th pick.www.nytimes.com
I refuse to believe Mason… unless that was a typo in the header. That would be too good to be true.He has both Jeanty and Warren potentially being there for the Bears
In this draft it will be harder.Trading back is not going to happen for the Bears.
But trading up??Trading back is not going to happen for the Bears.
Trading back is not going to happen for the Bears.
What’s the obsession? He’s a pain in the ass when he’s here and people can’t live with the fact that he’s not here. Much like the lions knucklehead. It seems many here. Just like to have a whipping boy but it ruins threads. Let’s just appreciate his absence and hope it continues.It’s just a few days until the draft and @ILoveDick refuses to log in and give us his opinions under his new moniker. Imagine getting the “Dick Lover’s Report” to ponder a few days out!
Will he show up after the picks are in? Will he self ban and sulk forever?
All I can say is thanks Rome for winning that bet for me!
Bears could move to 5 with giving up a 1st and second and probably get back a 4th.But trading up??
He uses terrible terminology. He refers to teams “moving back in the first round”. Moving BACK sounds like trading down, But he means moving back INTO the first round by trading up, does he not?Trading back is not going to happen for the Bears.
I don't think in this case he is....I believe it is trading back.....whether its all BS or not waits to be seen. But these teams don't have a lot of ammo to move back into the first round.He uses terrible terminology. He refers to teams “moving back in the first round” which sounds like trading down, but he means moving back INTO the first round by trading up, does he not?
Their best bet IMO is with Miami if they want to move up for a tackle. (Obviously I want a tackle so I wouldn’t do that)
I thought he meant teams trying to move back as in get extra picks later.He uses terrible terminology. He refers to teams “moving back in the first round”. Moving BACK sounds like trading down, But he means moving back INTO the first round by trading up, does he not?