- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 45,500
- Liked Posts:
- 55,121
There's a lot of barf with this if you're a Bears fan, and it starts with pick #24 and #28.
Interesting that Kelvin Banks Jr is not in the first round.
He has him at 6
There's a lot of barf with this if you're a Bears fan, and it starts with pick #24 and #28.
Interesting that Kelvin Banks Jr is not in the first round.
View attachment 45234
Greg is drinking again
Just wait until he drafts Mason Graham! I have read on this very board that he sucks and sucks some more.
Left Tackle?And LT at Texas Christian. Not exactly a football powerhouse
I can’t. He blocked my 6th account today.Ask him “who is Tyler Murray?”
Matt Forte Chris Johnson etc, I could write a small novel of guys who's talent was evident but happened to pick on future accountants and insurance salesman.Marshall Faulk too
LT is a risky pick because they already have a young developmental player there. Once they extend Thuney the interior OL will be blocked for the next couple years.
That makes Campbell and Banks even more risky options because they both could be forced inside to guard. DE is also tricky because Sweat's likely here for at least the next two years and Dayo plays a lot of snaps.
Your link is broke
Barf
Edit: looks like they switched this to this mornings mock again
Literally!Your link is broke
Campbell and Banks are expected to play tackle. Even those acknowledging that there's a chance they may need to move inside are very high on their future there, and Campbell has even been mentioned as a possibility at Center.LT is a risky pick because they already have a young developmental player there. Once they extend Thuney the interior OL will be blocked for the next couple years.
That makes Campbell and Banks even more risky options because they both could be forced inside to guard. DE is also tricky because Sweat's likely here for at least the next two years and Dayo plays a lot of snaps.
Your link is broke
Seeing as how I parlayed banks and mykel to go in the top 10, I like this draft lol
Zabel at 11. Wow.
Yea we’ll see. If I’m Poles though, I couldn’t live with some random clip of “we were prepared to take Tet at 5, but got an offer to move down and still got our guy”. Maybe if I’m getting a QB, LT, or Edge, but not for a RB. That kills my resume.I hope you are right because I think if they pass, there's a chance he makes it to 10. If I were taking an offensive weapon and were them, it'd be jeanty
Oh I wouldn’t trade up for jeanty. I just think Jax taking him may be legit.Yea we’ll see. If I’m Poles though, I couldn’t live with some random clip of “we were prepared to take Tet at 5, but got an offer to move down and still got our guy”. Maybe if I’m getting a QB, LT, or Edge, but not for a RB. That kills my resume.
I refuse to believe Green and Nolen slip out of the 1st.
Zabel at 11. Wow.
Overall I think DJs mock is pretty terribleI refuse to believe Green and Nolen slip out of the 1st.
Agreed, Pearce as well. Can’t buy all 3 slipping out of the 1stI refuse to believe Green and Nolen slip out of the 1st.
You're painting a very rosy picture. Campbell has been consistently labeled as lacking the arm length needed to play LT. Banks has been consistently viewed as having poor balance and athleticism as well as lacking awareness in pass protection. Banks is clearly listed as an OG by Dane Brugler and others.Campbell and Banks are expected to play tackle. Even those acknowledging that there's a chance they may need to move inside are very high on their future there, and Campbell has even been mentioned as a possibility at Center.
"Risky" is the last word I would use to describe them as prospects.
If you mean simply that it's a "risk" that the Bears would have terrific depth and flexibility, then I suppose that's true.
Using #10 on a guy who would be a backup immediately or would definitely only be IOL is one thing. But they both are likely to stick at T, and IOL would not be a bad thing and that's worst case scenario.