- Joined:
- May 17, 2010
- Posts:
- 13,947
- Liked Posts:
- 3,118
I wouldn't mind kicking the tires on Mark Reynolds to see if the Orioles would be interested in parting with him, but Reynolds would make Ramirez look like a gold glover at 3B.
Yeah, because who exactly gives us a better shot to win at 3B? Mark DeRosa? lol
Yeah, because who exactly gives us a better shot to win at 3B? Mark DeRosa? lol
Ramirez can't handle the pressure of contending. He shits his pants in the spotlight. Since the Cubs tanked, he's started to hit homers. He's irrelevant.
My god why do we have to spout this nonsense again and again. Did he suddenly forgot how to hit when it mattered just because a couple years in a row when the Cubs were terrible he got off to a slow start?
you have to admit he does play well when the games dont matter. cmon now.
and 16 million for him....please
My god why do we have to spout this nonsense again and again. Did he suddenly forgot how to hit when it mattered just because a couple years in a row when the Cubs were terrible he got off to a slow start?
Ramirez can't handle the pressure of contending. He shits his pants in the spotlight. Since the Cubs tanked, he's started to hit homers. He's irrelevant.
He can't handle the pressure of contending? Did you miss 07 & 08 when Ramirez was a top 3B in all of baseball?
He is flat out one of the best 3B in the game right now. While it is sad that 3B is that bad, why get rid of him when there are no better options out there?
Oh and since you think Ramirez can't handle pressure, take a look at WPA, it will show you that Ramirez's only below average year in terms of coming through, clutch, helping the team to win, was last year.
That's the thing. He's consistent. Consistent at getting off to a bad start and playing well down the stretch when there's no pressure. IMO he has no business being on a contender. He's a choke artist.
That's the thing. He's consistent. Consistent at getting off to a bad start and playing well down the stretch when there's no pressure. IMO he has no business being on a contender. He's a choke artist.
That is just factually wrong. It has happened the past two seasons. In 2009 he was hitting .333/.375/.500 before he got hurt. He was huge for the team in 2007 down the stretch when the club was fighting and clawing for a playoff spot. Two years in a row this has happened, but to act like this has been his career pattern is wrong.
He can't handle the pressure of contending? Did you miss 07 & 08 when Ramirez was a top 3B in all of baseball?
He is flat out one of the best 3B in the game right now. While it is sad that 3B is that bad, why get rid of him when there are no better options out there?
Let's look at 07-08, when the Cubs needed Rammy the most. .080 batting average. Cubs lose 6 games. Those are the best 2 stats I need to prove Ramirez isn't clutch.Oh and since you think Ramirez can't handle pressure, take a look at WPA, it will show you that Ramirez's only below average year in terms of coming through, clutch, helping the team to win, was last year.
He is a choke artist? Oh my god... You have no idea what you're talking about. How does he "choke" at all?
Bad start? Yeah, his sOPS of 114 this April was sooooo bad. God damn him for being above average! Damn him to hell!
What did he do in the playoffs? :thinking:
That's right. 2-23 in 6 games over the span of 2007-2008.
:lmao:
Alex Rodriguez and David Wright say hi.
To save the Cubs $16M they don't have
Let's look at 07-08, when the Cubs needed Rammy the most. .080 batting average. Cubs lose 6 games. Those are the best 2 stats I need to prove Ramirez isn't clutch.
This is a pointless argument because you are clearly ignoring sample size and picking at most a 100 ABs of a guys career to determine how they perform in pressure situations. There is no point in continuing this because you ignore all evidence that is contrary.
OK he had a great 07, 08, 09. But when the Cubs needed him most, he faltered plain and simple. They needed him the most in the playoffs, and Ramirez disappeared.This is a pointless argument because you are clearly ignoring sample size and picking at most a 100 ABs of a guys career to determine how they perform in pressure situations. There is no point in continuing this because you ignore all evidence that is contrary.