Official: Winter Meetings Thread

AddisonStation

YamaHama it's fright nite
Donator
Joined:
Nov 30, 2010
Posts:
1,613
Liked Posts:
434
Location:
Rocky Top
Any stat used by itself is meaningless.

Ya, of course, but BA task the cake. If you are going to throw around BA you have to add the OBP with it. Otherwise it's dogshit.
 

FirstTimer

v. 2.0: Fully Modded
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
May 4, 2010
Posts:
27,077
Liked Posts:
15,145
Sometimes you can have an empty OBP. The OPS is a nice guideline but the fact that you're adding two numbers with different denominators is wacky. I agree about wOBA though.

wOBA is a subjectively adjusted metric and not a "stat"
 

Rice Cube

World Series Dreaming
Donator
Joined:
Jun 7, 2011
Posts:
18,077
Liked Posts:
3,472
Location:
Chicago
wOBA is a subjectively adjusted metric and not a "stat"

I think Tango uses large datasets to adjust each weight. It's not an official statistic but it is a useful metric to measure a player's offensive production.
 

AddisonStation

YamaHama it's fright nite
Donator
Joined:
Nov 30, 2010
Posts:
1,613
Liked Posts:
434
Location:
Rocky Top
wOBA is a subjectively adjusted metric and not a "stat"

It's subjective based on the run values per event and park/league adjustments but it still includes what actually happens on the field.
 

DewsSox79

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 24, 2010
Posts:
29,059
Liked Posts:
7,249
Not true. OBP, OPS, and wOBA all can be used by themselves.

are_u_on_drugs.jpg


I really hope you post some of the garbage you do to get reactions from users. If you actually believe the shit you say on here, you should make sure to stop watching baseball.
 

nwfisch

Hall of Famer
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '21
Joined:
Nov 12, 2010
Posts:
25,053
Liked Posts:
11,503
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Minnesota United FC
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Notre Dame Fighting Irish
BA is accurate too, but that doesn't mean it should be used alone in judging a player. It should be looked at, along with many stats and metrics when evaluating a player.

It's silly to just say one stat/metric is the end-all, be-all for evaluating player.
 

AddisonStation

YamaHama it's fright nite
Donator
Joined:
Nov 30, 2010
Posts:
1,613
Liked Posts:
434
Location:
Rocky Top
BA is accurate too, but that doesn't mean it should be used alone in judging a player. It should be looked at, along with many stats and metrics when evaluating a player.

It's silly to just say one stat/metric is the end-all, be-all for evaluating player.

Thats the thing about wOBA, it DOES include everything. Read about it... It covers everything offensively.

You'd have to check their numbers to see how that player got their wOBA but it'd be correct in scoring the player's production.
 

nwfisch

Hall of Famer
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '21
Joined:
Nov 12, 2010
Posts:
25,053
Liked Posts:
11,503
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Minnesota United FC
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Notre Dame Fighting Irish
Thats the thing about wOBA, it DOES include everything. Read about it... It covers everything offensively.

You'd have to check their numbers to see how that player got their wOBA but it'd be correct in scoring the player's production.
The argument isn't whether or not wOBA is accurate. The point I'm making is just because it includes a lot of things, it doesn't mean it's the only metric that should be used in judging a player.

No metric or stat alone should be used to determine to judge a players greatness and worth.
 

IvyPickin87

Sinkin Putts ****in Butts
Donator
Joined:
May 29, 2010
Posts:
2,248
Liked Posts:
553
Location:
Des Moines IA
I have been gone i dont know how many months and you guys are still arguing over the SAME EXACT SHIT!!! Lets drop the stats arguement and get back to winter meetings.... I have to get my fix of where Jason Kendall is gonna go!!!
 

AddisonStation

YamaHama it's fright nite
Donator
Joined:
Nov 30, 2010
Posts:
1,613
Liked Posts:
434
Location:
Rocky Top
The argument isn't whether or not wOBA is accurate. The point I'm making is just because it includes a lot of things, it doesn't mean it's the only metric that should be used in judging a player.

No metric or stat alone should be used to determine to judge a players greatness and worth.

I agree but if I HAD to choose one itd be wOBA.

I have been gone i dont know how many months and you guys are still arguing over the SAME EXACT SHIT!!! Lets drop the stats arguement and get back to winter meetings.... I have to get my fix of where Jason Kendall is gonna go!!!

Shit don't change... Never will either.
 

The Bandit

vick27m
Donator
Joined:
Oct 18, 2010
Posts:
2,076
Liked Posts:
579
Location:
The open road
The argument isn't whether or not wOBA is accurate. The point I'm making is just because it includes a lot of things, it doesn't mean it's the only metric that should be used in judging a player.

No metric or stat alone should be used to determine to judge a players greatness and worth.

WAR :troll:
 

Top