Official: Winter Meetings Thread

daddies3angels

Is it next year yet?
Donator
Joined:
Apr 17, 2010
Posts:
10,038
Liked Posts:
819
Location:
Peoria IL
Watching Theo interview, reading articles he asked fans for patience, they going to sign a lot of shit players for depth and even read article LaHair has about 99% chance to be starting 1B over Fielder or Pujojs
 

waldo7239117

Driving Wreckless DA Best
Donator
Joined:
May 10, 2010
Posts:
11,225
Liked Posts:
788
They said LaHair will have a shot to make the team, no guarantee. Doesn't sound too promising to me.
 

waldo7239117

Driving Wreckless DA Best
Donator
Joined:
May 10, 2010
Posts:
11,225
Liked Posts:
788
Cubs: Day 1, Rumors O’ Rumors |

On day 1 of the Winter Meetings, the Cubs made no moves; however rumors/notes was far from none: Here’s the latest from the opening of the Meetings:

*By far the biggest news that broke yesterday was legend Ron Santo received 15 of 16 votes and was elected to the Hall of Fame. He’ll be enshrine on July 22nd and be the class of 2012.

*The Cubs met with Pujols’ agent Dan Lozano yesterday. Nothing came out of the meeting, but Cubs were just trying to see the numbers Pujols is looking for. However, Lozano is Rodrigo Lopez’s agent too and the Cubs have interest in bring him back. The meeting was regarding both Pujols and Lopez. I don’t see the Cubs signing Pujols because the Miami Marlins reportedly went to 10 years on an offer the Pujols.

*The Cubs sat down down with CJ Wilson’s agent yesterday and have gauge interest. The Cubs do have interest in Wilson, but not for the money and years he wants. The Nats may have gone 6 years on him, but GM Mike Rizzo shot that down. So.. who knows. Wilson looks Washington or Los Angeles (Angels) bound.

*The Cubs are expected to meet with Prince Fielder’s agent Scott Boras soon (sounds like it’ll be today) and see what he’s looking for. The Cubs sound that like they will go with more money a year rather than given him more of a lengthy contract. Also, Carlos Pena is expected to be brought up in that meeting too.

*The Marlins talked to the Cubs and asked what the price is for Carlos Zambrano. No word on what the Cubs said, but we may see a Zambrano trade. Especially if the Marlins lose out on pitchers Mark Buehrle and CJ Wilson. Carlos Zambrano spoke yesterday and said he expects to be a Cub come 2012.

*The Cubs are getting a little interest in Alfonso Soriano and it’s by AL clubs. The Cubs will have to eat majorty of the 3 years/54 million left on his contract. We already know that and figure Team Theo will.

*Brain LaHair had lunch with Theo Epstein and Jed Hoyer…he was receiving the minor league MVP award. Theo/Hoyer did not say LaHair will be on the big league club in 2012, but said they’ll give him every shot to make the team out of spring training.

*Placido Polanco could be on the Cubs radar if make available by the Phillies. The Phills are pursuing Aramis Ramirez and could make a push and sign him any time now. If that move were to happen, Polanco would then be made available. Since the Cubs need a 3B, they were mentioned. I don’t see it happening because he’s owe 6.25 million, too old and is injury prone.

*The Rockies want either Tyler Colvin or Scott Maine for 3B Ian Stewart. Rather than Blake DeWitt as a report stated. I would do Scott Maine for Ian Stewart, it sounds fair. People are saying wait untill he’s non-tendered, but the Rockies are expected to tender Stewart a contract. So.. the Cubs would have to make a trade for Stewart.

*However, a Stewart trade won’t happen until the Chase Headley situation is over. Either the Cubs trade for Headley or they say the Padres are asking for too much. The Cubs spoke with Josh Byrnes yesterday and the price was too high. The Cubs are hoping his price drops and they are able to acquire him. Headley is still at the top of their list. The Padres want a RP in return and like James Russell. Also, their said to have interest in Carlos Marmol too. So… we’ll see what happens with the Headley situation on day 2. If it’s resolved or not.

*Edwin Jackson may be on the Cubs radar. The Cubs reportedly like him and already lost out on two pitchers to the Dodgers (Chris Capauno and Aaron Harang).

*Cuban’ Yoenis Cespedes agent said Cespedes is looking for double the money Chapman receive. The contract Cespedes is looking for is close to 60 million. I don’t know where the Cubs stand now, but they do still have interest.

Well that’s the latest from a busy day 1 at the Winter Meetings for Team Theo. So… let’s hope day 2 brings moves, not just rumors!
 

waldo7239117

Driving Wreckless DA Best
Donator
Joined:
May 10, 2010
Posts:
11,225
Liked Posts:
788
Cubs have their eye on Fielder... won't got 9-10 years, like Miami did. To Pujols.
 

daddies3angels

Is it next year yet?
Donator
Joined:
Apr 17, 2010
Posts:
10,038
Liked Posts:
819
Location:
Peoria IL
Tribune reporting tyring to dump Sori in BAL
 

BrewCrewFan

Active member
Joined:
Apr 17, 2010
Posts:
417
Liked Posts:
158
Location:
Wisconsin
Stay the hell away from Fielder. If MIA signs Pujols, trade for Sanchez.

I would hate Fielder if he signed with the Cubs.

oh, and lol at the Marlins. 10 yrs on Pujols? Who knows if his real age is actually true.
 

waldo7239117

Driving Wreckless DA Best
Donator
Joined:
May 10, 2010
Posts:
11,225
Liked Posts:
788
Sori to Balt may work and could be close.

The Cubs are expected to make a offer to Fielder today, more a year than they years in length.

If the Cubs can sign Fielder, trade for Headley and add SP... it may be a good season. Also, try their best to get Cespedes, then when Jackson's ready Could be good...

1) DeJesus RF
2) Castro SS
3) Headley 3B
4) Fielder 1B
5) Cespedes CF
6) Jackson LF
7) Soto C
8) Barney
9) Pitcher

O'Dawg may come with Headley and that means Headley would be cheaper. I'd rather have Hudson at 2B over Batrney. Castillo back-up C, Barney utility, Baker utility, Campy 5th OF and Byrd 4th OF. Non-tender DeWitt and Hill (if can't trade either). It's more of dreaming, but it actually could happen tho.
 

daddies3angels

Is it next year yet?
Donator
Joined:
Apr 17, 2010
Posts:
10,038
Liked Posts:
819
Location:
Peoria IL
BAL Reporting they have no intrest in Sori
 

Lex L.

New member
Joined:
Apr 21, 2010
Posts:
2,301
Liked Posts:
253
Sori to Balt may work and could be close.

The Cubs are expected to make a offer to Fielder today, more a year than they years in length.

If the Cubs can sign Fielder, trade for Headley and add SP... it may be a good season. Also, try their best to get Cespedes, then when Jackson's ready Could be good...

1) DeJesus RF
2) Castro SS
3) Headley 3B
4) Fielder 1B
5) Cespedes CF
6) Jackson LF
7) Soto C
8) Barney
9) Pitcher

O'Dawg may come with Headley and that means Headley would be cheaper. I'd rather have Hudson at 2B over Batrney. Castillo back-up C, Barney utility, Baker utility, Campy 5th OF and Byrd 4th OF. Non-tender DeWitt and Hill (if can't trade either). It's more of dreaming, but it actually could happen tho.

Headly has only had 2 seasons with 400 at bats and the best he's done is .264. I don't get all this hype. I'm not saying he would be bad but the rampant assumption around here is that he'll be awesome and he still has a lot to prove.

Also, where is this coming from that DeJesus will be the lead off hitter. Is Brett Jackson going to Arizona for spring training? What if he does well?

Fielder or Castro should be the 3 hitter over Headley.
 

waldo7239117

Driving Wreckless DA Best
Donator
Joined:
May 10, 2010
Posts:
11,225
Liked Posts:
788
Headley will be good on the North Side. I'm not a big fan of him, but would completely deal for him. I'd rather have Castro at 2 than 3. Or Headley 5 and Cespedes at 3.

It's been reported more than one place that the O's do have interest in Fonzie.
 

bleacherbum54

GoCubsGo
Joined:
Apr 3, 2011
Posts:
2,807
Liked Posts:
641
Location:
Indianapolis
Cant see us getting Cespedes anymore 60+m for a guy who has never faced MLB talent we probably pass.
 

Lex L.

New member
Joined:
Apr 21, 2010
Posts:
2,301
Liked Posts:
253
Headley will be good on the North Side. I'm not a big fan of him, but would completely deal for him. I'd rather have Castro at 2 than 3. Or Headley 5 and Cespedes at 3.

It's been reported more than one place that the O's do have interest in Fonzie.

Why would you not put Fielder at 3 then?

Also where is this coming from that DeJesus was signed to be the leadoff hitter?
 

waldo7239117

Driving Wreckless DA Best
Donator
Joined:
May 10, 2010
Posts:
11,225
Liked Posts:
788
Why would you not put Fielder at 3 then?

Also where is this coming from that DeJesus was signed to be the leadoff hitter?

Bruce Levine was told DeJesus would be the lead-off man.

Fielder would have to be the big bat in the line-up. He was the 3 hitter in Miilwaukee because they had Braun. There would be no one else who's more suitable to be the clean-up hitter.
 

Lex L.

New member
Joined:
Apr 21, 2010
Posts:
2,301
Liked Posts:
253
Bruce Levine was told DeJesus would be the lead-off man.

Fielder would have to be the big bat in the line-up. He was the 3 hitter in Miilwaukee because they had Braun. There would be no one else who's more suitable to be the clean-up hitter.

Actually, the 3 hitter is supposed to be the best hitter in your lineup. You want the big bat coming up in as many RBI situations as possible. This is why Fielder should be #3 if you're going to insist on Castro at #2. If you move Castro to 3, then OK. Headley's best season with over 400 at bats is .264. That's hardly worth not pushign Fielder up towards the table setters.

For someone to be a 3 in front of Fielder, they would need to be a significant run producer themself. If they're not, you don't want to risk having someone end innings with Fielder on deck.

I wouldnt put a lot of stock in what Levine is saying. It's not like DeJesus has been so awesome that it's an undeniable certainty that he'll produce well enough to bat lead off. DeJesus could be a good leadoff hitter but it's more likely that he would be an excellent table setter at the bottom of order when the lineup wraps around.
 
Last edited:

FirstTimer

v. 2.0: Fully Modded
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
May 4, 2010
Posts:
27,077
Liked Posts:
15,145
I'd think you would bat Castro in front of Fielder if the Cubs signed him
 

waldo7239117

Driving Wreckless DA Best
Donator
Joined:
May 10, 2010
Posts:
11,225
Liked Posts:
788
Actually, the 3 hitter is supposed to be the best hitter in your lineup. You want the big bat coming up in as many RBI situations as possible. This is why Fielder should be #3 if you're going to insist on Castro at #2. If you move Castro to 3, then OK. Headley's best season with over 400 at bats is .264. That's hardly worth not pushign Fielder up towards the table setters.

For someone to be a 3 in front of Fielder, they would need to be a significant run producer themself. If they're not, you don't want to risk having someone end innings with Fielder on deck.

I wouldnt put a lot of stock in what Levine is saying. It's not like DeJesus has been so awesome that it's an undeniable certainty that he'll produce well enough to bat lead off. DeJesus could be a good leadoff hitter but it's more likely that he would be an excellent table setter at the bottom of order when the lineup wraps around.

That is true, about the 3 hitter... But the Cubs would have no cleanu-up hitter. So.. it's up for toss.
 

Top