OT: FTO: petition in Washington

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
63,300
Liked Posts:
40,401
I’m sure the joke wasn’t lost on you here, right?

No it wasnt. The poster quoted a post of mine that was deleted so I was using it to highlight the deletion of that post because I guess offensive terms against whites is a no no but they are ok when applied to a historically marginalized people.
 

didshereallysaythat

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 14, 2011
Posts:
21,254
Liked Posts:
10,120
No it wasnt. The poster quoted a post of mine that was deleted so I was using it to highlight the deletion of that post because I guess offensive terms against whites is a no no but they are ok when applied to a historically marginalized people.
They also need to get rid of the Vikings and especially that obnoxious horn. It's degrading to straight white Norwegian males.
 

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
63,300
Liked Posts:
40,401
They also need to get rid of the Vikings and especially that obnoxious horn. It's degrading to straight white Norwegian males.

I dont know that the term Viking was considered offensive but no skin off my back. Go for it.
 

Enasic

Who are the brain police?
Joined:
Mar 17, 2014
Posts:
14,310
Liked Posts:
10,113
Can it really be that offensive if Native Americans want it changed back?
 

Ares

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
42,353
Liked Posts:
35,069
Why do I feel South Park finna do an episode where a team named the Naggers are forced to change and then fight to regain their lost heritage?
 

Enasic

Who are the brain police?
Joined:
Mar 17, 2014
Posts:
14,310
Liked Posts:
10,113
Not going to pretend to be an expert on the history of the term - But at the very least, there seems to be some grey area/nuance at the very least. I’ve seen quite a few sources that actually dispute it being offensive at all.


 

Enasic

Who are the brain police?
Joined:
Mar 17, 2014
Posts:
14,310
Liked Posts:
10,113
That is a subset not all. Would be like saying the N word isnt offensive because some black people use it.

I don’t think it’s the same but I’m out of my element with Native American culture and accepted terminology.
 

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
63,300
Liked Posts:
40,401
Not going to pretend to be an expert on the history of the term - But at the very least, there seems to be some grey area/nuance at the very least. I’ve seen quite a few sources that actually dispute it being offensive at all.


"Decades later, the word "redskin" began to take on a negative, increasingly violent connotation. Author L. Frank Baum, best known for his classic The Wizard of Oz, celebrated the death of Sitting Bull and the massacre at Wounded Knee with a pair of editorials calling for the extermination of all remaining Native Americans. In one of the December 1890 pieces, Baum wrote, "With his fall the nobility of the Redskin is extinguished, and what few are left are a pack of whining curs who lick the hand that smites them.""
 

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
63,300
Liked Posts:
40,401
I don’t think it’s the same but I’m out of my element with Native American culture and accepted terminology.

Obviously the N word is considered far more offensive but the point is that just because some people of a group are ok with doesnt mean they are all.

In a commentary published soon after the 2004 poll, 15 Native American scholars collaborated on a critique that stated that there were so many flaws in the Annenberg study that rather than being a measure of Native American opinion, it was an expression of white privilege and colonialism.[6] A 2019 poll by University of California, Berkeley surveyed 1,021 Native Americans, twice as many as in any previous polls.[162] 38% of self-identified Native Americans said they were not bothered by the Washington Redskins name. But 49% overall said it was offensive, along with 67% of respondents who were heavily engaged in their native or tribal cultures, 60% of young people, and 52% of those with tribal affiliations.



This explains the problems with the 90% poll which is that it did not use probability sampling or ensure equal probability of selection ie it was not a representative sample of all Native American viewpoints and likely included people that werent Native American at all.

This also shows the results of another larger poll that followed the peinciples above and basically the more involved people were with their Native identity the more likely it was that they considered it offensive.
 
Last edited:

didshereallysaythat

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 14, 2011
Posts:
21,254
Liked Posts:
10,120
"Decades later, the word "redskin" began to take on a negative, increasingly violent connotation. Author L. Frank Baum, best known for his classic The Wizard of Oz, celebrated the death of Sitting Bull and the massacre at Wounded Knee with a pair of editorials calling for the extermination of all remaining Native Americans. In one of the December 1890 pieces, Baum wrote, "With his fall the nobility of the Redskin is extinguished, and what few are left are a pack of whining curs who lick the hand that smites them.""
That is exactly right. The actually history of the term is not racist or offensive, or atleast it is not intended to be racist or offensive. However, over the years, the perception became offensive and thus the name change.

It just goes to show that anything can be eventually taken out of context and be considered offensive down the road. A common phrase you use today in the office might get you fired in 20 years. That's just the world we live in. It is what it is.
 

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
63,300
Liked Posts:
40,401
That is exactly right. The actually history of the term is not racist or offensive, or atleast it is not intended to be racist or offensive. However, over the years, the perception became offensive and thus the name change.

It just goes to show that anything can be eventually taken out of context and be considered offensive down the road. A common phrase you use today in the office might get you fired in 20 years. That's just the world we live in. It is what it is.

Well the original historical usage was Native Americans using it to describe themselves which different than an outsider using it to describe them.
 

sevvy

Get rich, or try dying
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
13,804
Liked Posts:
20,061
Location:
Charlotte, NC
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Bears
They should have been the Hogs. And the Cleveland Indians should have been the Cleveland Spiders.

But I think these organizations get scared and go with the most generic sounding name they can come up with. Commanders and Guardians sound like team names on a Nickelodeon kid's game show, not professional sports teams.
 

DC

Minister of Archaic Titillations
Donator
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
11,687
Liked Posts:
9,148
Location:
Colorado
Stigma for the brands that choose to advertise their business in the stadium name? Perhaps “Northwest Stadium” thinks “Redskins” is a bad look. Follow the $.
 

HeHateMe

He/Himz/Hiz
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
59,372
Liked Posts:
52,301
That is exactly right. The actually history of the term is not racist or offensive, or atleast it is not intended to be racist or offensive. However, over the years, the perception became offensive and thus the name change.

It just goes to show that anything can be eventually taken out of context and be considered offensive down the road. A common phrase you use today in the office might get you fired in 20 years. That's just the world we live in. It is what it is.
So people flying confederate flags in northern Michigan are just expressing "southern pride" and being taken out of context 🤔???
 

Top