OT: Sammy Sosa's skin

Rice Cube

World Series Dreaming
Donator
Joined:
Jun 7, 2011
Posts:
18,077
Liked Posts:
3,472
Location:
Chicago
What was the question again?

As a Cubs fan, I found the memories I had of Sammy Sosa much more fun than the 2005 White Sox World Series Championship. I would find a Cubs World Series Championship more fun than Sammy Sosa but would still not give up my memories of Sosa for the world.
 

cubsneedmiracle

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 28, 2010
Posts:
7,474
Liked Posts:
1,778
What was the question again?

As a Cubs fan, I found the memories I had of Sammy Sosa much more fun than the 2005 White Sox World Series Championship. I would find a Cubs World Series Championship more fun than Sammy Sosa but would still not give up my memories of Sosa for the world.

That's a small tarnish.. what I'm getting at is totally hypothetical at this point..

Forget exact teams, years.. Just in pure hypothetical terms..

Let's say you have 2 middle of the order hitters and several pitchers that used in a season that ends up with a championship.

If we going on the idea that we wouldn't want to regard one player of his achievement.. Couldn't the same be said for integral parts of a team? Wouldn't that be tarnished?

That's what I'm trying to get an answer from. Leave actual teams out because this is just an exercise.

Everyone is dancing around it. Lol.
 

cubsneedmiracle

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 28, 2010
Posts:
7,474
Liked Posts:
1,778
If my team won the World Series I don't think I give a shit how they did it as long as it didn't involve rape or murder :lol:

So then doesn't that negate the whole thought of not acting like Sosa existed?

Honestly.. it can't work both ways.. at least in my mind.
 

Rice Cube

World Series Dreaming
Donator
Joined:
Jun 7, 2011
Posts:
18,077
Liked Posts:
3,472
Location:
Chicago
So then doesn't that negate the whole thought of not acting like Sosa existed?

Honestly.. it can't work both ways.. at least in my mind.

I don't think anyone who watched baseball in that span can deny that Sosa existed and was good at baseball.
 

cubsneedmiracle

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 28, 2010
Posts:
7,474
Liked Posts:
1,778
I don't think anyone who watched baseball in that span can deny that Sosa existed and was good at baseball.


sorry, il take a shitty ball player over a steroid abusing cheating player all day long. the real deal was matt karchner, how did that work out for ya? :rolleyes:

you're a pretty shitty fan if you are going to stick up for slammin sammy. let me guess you liked bonds too? or are you a hypocrit that thinks hes a prick for passin up your boy sammy....by whatta know.....cheating.

18174-C201009-Sammy-Sosa-White-Sox.jpg


xZwKQZ9Q.jpg


you are either just a giant homer or you believe he "just works out"

LMFAO Sexy and I know it lyrics - YouTube

Found one! :troll:
 

Rice Cube

World Series Dreaming
Donator
Joined:
Jun 7, 2011
Posts:
18,077
Liked Posts:
3,472
Location:
Chicago
Nobody's perfect.

To be fair, though, he's not saying Sosa wasn't good at baseball, he's just saying Sosa cheated and thus all his achievements are bunk. That's probably another conversation.
 

cubsneedmiracle

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 28, 2010
Posts:
7,474
Liked Posts:
1,778
Nobody's perfect.

To be fair, though, he's not saying Sosa wasn't good at baseball, he's just saying Sosa cheated and thus all his achievements are bunk. That's probably another conversation.

Nahh he says he'd rather have a shitty player than a cheater.. That's pretty much saying he wouldn't want him to exist..

That's where my whole point is.. with how the discussion went forth..

If the WS is the true success.. and in Dewey's mind.. a cheater shouldn't even be there even in past tense..

What if a team with a bunch of Juicer's won?

How would that be viewed then?

In my mind.. that would legitimize that era in total.. Cause I'm sure there are players that had effects in the post-season that used.. actually there are.

That's the whole point I'm trying to get across. I know they danced around it because you can't have it both ways.. Especially in past tense when use was so huge in the sport.
 

ZDemp34

That One Guy
Joined:
Dec 18, 2011
Posts:
625
Liked Posts:
121
Location:
West Chicago, IL
Nobody's perfect.

To be fair, though, he's not saying Sosa wasn't good at baseball, he's just saying Sosa cheated and thus all his achievements are bunk. That's probably another conversation.

Yeah true....I honestly don't care if he cheated though because either way, he was fun to watch. I'm not going to feed the Sox fans anything more
 

cubsneedmiracle

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 28, 2010
Posts:
7,474
Liked Posts:
1,778
The thing is the Mitchell report is probably less than 5% of what actually happened during the main User era..

You're probably looking at almost two decades worth of users effecting the outcomes of post-season series.
 

Rice Cube

World Series Dreaming
Donator
Joined:
Jun 7, 2011
Posts:
18,077
Liked Posts:
3,472
Location:
Chicago
The thing is the Mitchell report is probably less than 5% of what actually happened during the main User era..

You're probably looking at almost two decades worth of users effecting the outcomes of post-season series.

Probably more. I think steroids have been around well before the days of Canseco and McGwire.
 

cubsneedmiracle

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 28, 2010
Posts:
7,474
Liked Posts:
1,778
Probably more. I think steroids have been around well before the days of Canseco and McGwire.

Exactly what I'm getting at.

So I hope that there are teams that through time will be cleared of any suspicion.. because if its proven that just for example (one that you guys know of) 2005.. The Sox we're clean.. or very clean.. compared to Houston.. That's a larger achievement in itself.

That can be said for any post-season matchup in this era.. Which potentially could date back even 30 years or more..

I don't think we'll ever know the true usage.. There will probably be an amount of players that get off without having to answer to it.

I think dealing with the era we've been in.. (and in some cases still are in) It's hard to write off players just because they used.. It would be easy to do that if it was sparing usage. It's not from what we know.

That leads into the whole HoF thing which I'm sure as the Class of 2013 draws near will be a large topic.. and I'll leave that part of it for later.
 

brett05

867-5309
Joined:
Apr 28, 2009
Posts:
27,226
Liked Posts:
4,579
Location:
Hell
I am not sure what you think Sox fans are dancing around.

I do not think the proportion of usage was any different for any organization than another.
 

cubsneedmiracle

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 28, 2010
Posts:
7,474
Liked Posts:
1,778
I am not sure what you think Sox fans are dancing around.

I do not think the proportion of usage was any different for any organization than another.

Well it was up for basically two days.. other peoples posts got answered..

Just figuring on the full hypothetical not really even going on saying the Sox we're better or worse as a statement but more as potential example... but I think my answer was figured already.. so thanks for not playing :rimshot:
 

brett05

867-5309
Joined:
Apr 28, 2009
Posts:
27,226
Liked Posts:
4,579
Location:
Hell
I'm still not sure what we didn't play CNM. Perhaps, just perhaps you phrased it poorly
 

Top