Packers Down To 2 WR's: Both Jones & Cobb Out With Knee Injuries

Flacco4Prez

New member
Joined:
Apr 19, 2013
Posts:
913
Liked Posts:
170
More like Ravens O is garbage, Packers have not had big losses on Offense in past years

Finley, Bulaga, Jennings, just to name a few. Led the league in injuries when they won the SB

Packers missing 2 of their biggest playmakers on both sides of the ball right now. Hayward and Matthews both out on the defensive side of the ball as well
 

PrideisBears

Jordan Sigler’s editor
Staff member
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '21
Joined:
Jun 20, 2010
Posts:
38,587
Liked Posts:
26,985
Location:
In the mod forum planning your ban
They are a team that has constantly gotten it done with their starters injured. Look at their SB run. If I recall, they had like nine players on IR and won the whole thing.

They had two fucking starters injured. Why do I have to keep saying this?
 

DrGonzo

Gazpacho Police
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
9,260
Liked Posts:
5,076
Location:
Albuquerque, NM
Reasons why the Packers should beat us:

1) We needed three INTs to beat the lowly Giants. Rodgers will not throw one.
2) Lacy ran for 120 yds against Ngata. How many will he put up against our depleted Dline?

Reasons why we have a prayer:

1) Peanut will be back.
2) The offense is about ready to finally go off against the Packers (without Matthews).

Final score: GB 31, Chicago 27
 

Chris Sojka

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 25, 2012
Posts:
6,685
Liked Posts:
2,458
This is more Joe Flacco showing his inability to play in the regular season... He is great at throwing the long ball... other than that I really am not impressed...

I mean AJ Hawk had his best game ever...10 tackles 3 sacks... something is clearly wrong with the Ravens offense this year...
 

1ke

D.I.L.L.I.G.A.F.
Joined:
Jul 11, 2011
Posts:
3,354
Liked Posts:
1,640
Location:
Milwaukee
My favorite teams
  1. Milwaukee Bucks
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
Not to mention those sacks came on AJ running untouched through the middle if the line.
 

MacBear

New member
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
1,799
Liked Posts:
680
Reasons why the Packers should beat us:

1) We needed three INTs to beat the lowly Giants. Rodgers will not throw one.
2) Lacy ran for 120 yds against Ngata. How many will he put up against our depleted Dline?

Reasons why we have a prayer:

1) Peanut will be back.
2) The offense is about ready to finally go off against the Packers (without Matthews).

Final score: GB 31, Chicago 27
the giants had cruz and nicks. the packers have finley and nelson.

im more afraid of the packers run game than anything else
 

TL1961

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 24, 2013
Posts:
33,020
Liked Posts:
17,079
Not too sure about that. Jimmy beat him for the Int in the endzone. And one bone headed play cost them the game on defense.



I think they did though. One TD today and a bunch of FGs.



But none of those guys were considered "the guy" like Cobb is. Throw in Jones as another key player. What they did was obviously incredibly impressive, but nothing like losing their WR corps.



I agree, but I dont know how abused they will get now, when they might have to change the way they play. But yes, GB is still the biggest hurdle, Detroit will Detroit themselves right out of the picture.

Any time you can use "Detroit" as a verb, I applaud.
 

Doubledown

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
6,247
Liked Posts:
2,728
This is more Joe Flacco showing his inability to play in the regular season... He is great at throwing the long ball... other than that I really am not impressed...

I mean AJ Hawk had his best game ever...10 tackles 3 sacks... something is clearly wrong with the Ravens offense this year...
made hawk look like an All Pro, Packer were ready to Cut him before the Season.
 

TL1961

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 24, 2013
Posts:
33,020
Liked Posts:
17,079
Reasons why the Packers should beat us:

1) We needed three INTs to beat the lowly Giants. Rodgers will not throw one.
2) Lacy ran for 120 yds against Ngata. How many will he put up against our depleted Dline?

Reasons why we have a prayer:

1) Peanut will be back.
2) The offense is about ready to finally go off against the Packers (without Matthews).

Final score: GB 31, Chicago 27

3) Lacy fumbles
 

payton 34ever

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 21, 2010
Posts:
1,416
Liked Posts:
808
Location:
West Des Moines, IA
This team is basically Rodgers and his receivers. Of course losing a couple of key guys hurts them...silly to say otherwise.
 

illmatic34

New member
Joined:
Sep 12, 2012
Posts:
392
Liked Posts:
114
They had two fucking starters injured. Why do I have to keep saying this?

Rodgers still threw for 315 yards with his 2 WR's injured. He still has Finley and Nelson. Since he's an elite QB, he can elevate the play of others around him. I'm sure they'll rely more on their running game in the time being. And yes, I'm aware that "they had two fucking starters injured" - my point is that they can still "fucking" play well offensively even with Cobb and Jones out.
 

1ke

D.I.L.L.I.G.A.F.
Joined:
Jul 11, 2011
Posts:
3,354
Liked Posts:
1,640
Location:
Milwaukee
My favorite teams
  1. Milwaukee Bucks
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
Rodgers still threw for 315 yards with his 2 WR's injured. He still has Finley and Nelson. Since he's an elite QB, he can elevate the play of others around him. I'm sure they'll rely more on their running game in the time being. And yes, I'm aware that "they had two fucking starters injured" - my point is that they can still "fucking" play well offensively even with Cobb and Jones out.

But today showed real evidence that they cannot. 300 yards in todays NFL is not much of an accomplishment.
 

TillerNOS

New member
Joined:
Nov 5, 2012
Posts:
382
Liked Posts:
76
I think you missed his point. Thebyear the pack won the superbowl they were only down two starters...not 9 like the sports media kept propagating
 

illmatic34

New member
Joined:
Sep 12, 2012
Posts:
392
Liked Posts:
114
But today showed real evidence that they cannot. 300 yards in todays NFL is not much of an accomplishment.

I'm aware it's not much of a compliment. But it proves they can still move the ball around. And they still have their running game to rely on.
 

MacBear

New member
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
1,799
Liked Posts:
680
I'm aware it's not much of a compliment. But it proves they can still move the ball around. And they still have their running game to rely on.

if the packers O plays the way they did against the ravens, they will probably lose.

the bears O is not going to keep handing the ball back to green bay like the ravens were. the bears offense is superior to the ravens in every way.
 

DrGonzo

Gazpacho Police
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
9,260
Liked Posts:
5,076
Location:
Albuquerque, NM
if the packers O plays the way they did against the ravens, they will probably lose.

the bears O is not going to keep handing the ball back to green bay like the ravens were. the bears offense is superior to the ravens in every way.

Sorry but even if they've taken a step back the Ravens' D is better than the Bears'. I highly doubt we hold Rodgers to 19.
 

Doug Grohlin

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 11, 2011
Posts:
1,709
Liked Posts:
941
Location:
Kenosha
if the packers O plays the way they did against the ravens, they will probably lose.

the bears O is not going to keep handing the ball back to green bay like the ravens were. the bears offense is superior to the ravens in every way.

Definitely! GB played like shit today. They lucked out a win caused by Harbaugh stupidity and bad safety coverage on a deep pass. I have a feeling Jay is done playing bitch fiddle to the Pack.
 

MacBear

New member
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
1,799
Liked Posts:
680
Sorry but even if they've taken a step back the Ravens' D is better than the Bears'. I highly doubt we hold Rodgers to 19.
maybe. but if the bears can finally man up and stop the run, rodgers really has his work cut out for him if tillman is healthy. he's got no one to throw to. the bears will be able to blitz all day.
 

Top