Realistic View VS Homeristtic View - Which are You

[3rd N Long]

The vast majority of paragraphs in the OP contain "Cutler" or "Jay;" yet it is not about Jay. "Logic." :lmao:

His Cutler obsession is quite strong.

 

[3rd N Long]

Sometimes I feel like Broc and Mongo are the same person.

Funny you should mention that. The site I came from before was a Chicago Bears fan forums that slowly devolved into a big fat steaming pile of Cutler sucks at life site. Where any dissent was immediately shot down for ever suggesting otherwise.

The crazy part is that Mongo was a huge Cutler supporter at one point. I think when he finally changed his mind on that. He felt that he needed to make up for all his past sins of giving Cutler credit and here we are now. I can only assume that Broc also suffers from this PTSD as well.

I'm very entertained to see how Mongo is treated on this site. Even the posters that would normally be like minded, in his distaste for Cutler, don't seem like they want to let him sit down at their lunch table.

I suppose every set of fan forums has to have at least one hater and one devoted fan of a certain player. That takes it way, way too far with their obsession on the subject.

Also,

Am I the only one who wonders if his bedroom looks like Ray Finkle's room and everything that said Marino has Cutler painted over it in blood?

 

[3rd N Long]

Apparently both were at Disney for two weeks. Mongo did you see broc at Disney?

Ever since I came over from the other site I've been wondering who the trolls from the other site are. They actually led me to this site by mentioning how they enjoyed fucking with the posters on this website. Mongo uses the same name on both sites. As for any of the others. I haven't a clue who they are, other than some hunches on who they might be. If Mongo is actually posting under other names as well I would love to know. I assumed the mods on this site would make it obvious if this was the case but I could be wrong.

 

[3rd N Long]

The worst part is it probably took you 20 minutes post this shit. You profile says you are a Cubs fan. And you take the time to post this shit in the middle of their post season game that was extremely exciting?

Some obsessions are just that strong. I'm a White Sox fan myself and envy the Cubs fans at the moment. Their team is looking good and looking like they will be good for years to come. Hopefully they finally win it all for their fans. Being able to watch the World Series and see Konerko hit the grandslam in person is a once in a lifetime event for a Chicago Baseball fan. Hopefully the cubs give their fans a long awaited championship to celebrate.

I won't actively sit around rooting for it by watching the games but I will be happy for my friends if they do win. Too many good fans have waited their entire lives and some died waiting their entire lives for it to happen. Hopefully that ends this year or over the next couple.

The Bears haven't won it since I was 13 years old though and they are way overdue for a Super Bowl winner as well. So here's to Fox and company building a winner for the Bears fans, cheers.

 

[3rd N Long]

Thought u weren't about the stills breh

Ha, good call on that one. Even though he is J/K most likely. It does make him seem hypocritical doesn't it? :thinking:

 

[3rd N Long]

He has tape now

I thought he had you on this one but you're a slippery one indeed. Well played my friend.

 

[3rd N Long]

It appears I logged in to talk more Bears football, a couple of hours too late. Night gents

 

[delbjork1937]

A realistic view is: the Bears should have lost....but they were playing KC,so..

 

[Novak]

Just re-read thru this... mongo2lulzy

 

[Bearly]

1. Not one person said the words "Cutler won"
2. Cutler had a great game considering they were down 2 offensive linemen and the top 3 receivers. He never forced a ball in the first 3 quarters and had a few drops and false starts which hindered drives, yet he maintained his cool and was patient. The phantom PI was a make up call for the PI missed on the play before.
3. Fox is the head coach and is a leader. Cutler has shown leadership as well.
4. We scored 18 when the Chiefs give up 32 on average. Yes, but none of the other teams were missing their top 3 receivers and 2 linemen. The Chiefs also had to play at Green Bay and Cincinnati. They gave up atleast 14 garbage points to the Texans on the road in Week 1. Their only other home game (in one of the toughest home environments) was to the Broncos and Peyton Manning.
5. Cutler and the Bears D both played well and were large parts of the team win.
6. Agreed.
7. Agreed that we should not get too excited. Take it one game at a time.
8. Agreed, but irrelevant.
9. WTF

The phantom PI call was a fine call. You don't have to use your arms to cause PI.

As for the thread:

 

[botfly10]

OP is weird. Why would a homer view extend only to Cutler and not include any other players on the team? Doesn't make any sense.

 

[botfly10]

The phantom PI call was a fine call. You don't have to use your arms to cause PI.

yeah. A CB can't just stop on a route in front of a WR. If that CB had played the ball, he would have got a pic.

 

[Warrior Spirit]

This thread delivers. I am really a realistic realist in reality.

 

[1COBearsfan]

Can I choose both? I'm gonna choose both. Fuck your narrow-minded choices mongo, you're an idiot

 

[discplayer]

yeah. A CB can't just stop on a route in front of a WR. If that CB had played the ball, he would have got a pic.

yes. yes he would have intercepted it if he'd played the ball, since the ball was thrown Cutler-style (inaccurate) to the CB's side rather than the WR's back shoulder, like it was supposed to be.

the Chiefs only gripe could have been that the ball was uncatchable, or perhaps argue (rightly) that the WR was trying to go through the CB to get to the poorly thrown ball on the other side of the CB who'd established position on the inside, which, by definition, would have negated any PI call on the defense.

if the ball was underthrown, now that's a different story. both players can come back for it, and often it's the receiver who first sees it's underthrown.

but a poorly thrown ball to the wrong (defender's) side of the pair of players? that should NOT have been a PI on the D.

 

[didshereallysaythat]

yes. yes he would have intercepted it if he'd played the ball, since the ball was thrown Cutler-style (inaccurate) to the CB's side rather than the WR's back shoulder, like it was supposed to be.

the Chiefs only gripe could have been that the ball was uncatchable, or perhaps argue (rightly) that the WR was trying to go through the CB to get to the poorly thrown ball on the other side of the CB who'd established position on the inside, which, by definition, would have negated any PI call on the defense.

if the ball was underthrown, now that's a different story. both players can come back for it, and often it's the receiver who first sees it's underthrown.

but a poorly thrown ball to the wrong (defender's) side of the pair of players? that should NOT have been a PI on the D.

What about that dig pattern on the prior play where Wilson was blatantly held and prevented a completion?

 

[discplayer]

What about that dig pattern on the prior play where Wilson was blatantly held and prevented a completion?

that one SHOULD have been called, but not the one that was... again, in my opinion.

 

[Packer Fan]

Realist:
"Cutler had a decent game overall. He (as usual) put us behind by not protecting the ball (sack was not his fault, not protecting was). He Kinda sucked for 3 quarters. Then really played well in the 4th - props. And he also got a lot of help on a phantom PI call".

Put me in the Super Jay Cutler Homer category then because I don't want to be quoted using the word "props" in that context.

 

[SUPERFAN]

Butt hurt bitches
Bears won and cutlers more a part of that than you retards
So what if someone likes the qb of their team go suck something

 

[PrideisBears]

How do you straw someone?