Remydat's 1st Mock Offseason

vabearsfan15

Well-known member
Joined:
Mar 12, 2013
Posts:
7,680
Liked Posts:
5,511
Looking at the depth of the DL in this draft, I agree that OT should be a priority with our 1st rd pick. Then go best DL available in the 2nd.

I'm not high on resigning Keenan Allen or signing Mack. I like Allen and Williams does seem to rely on him to create space on crucial downs. But, it currently feels like we have too many cooks in the kitchen. Williams almost seems like he doesn't know who to throw it to at times and sporadically looks too many places before making a decision. Maybe you resign him if the price is really cheap, but I wouldn't prioritize it. I would rather first allocate the money to the OL and add a proven, young talent if availble.

As for Mack. I loved him when he was here, but we don't need to be allocating 15 mil a yr of cap space on a 34 yr old DE. Maybe if he was coming off a stellar year, but he has 5 sacks so far this season. I'm more in favor of getting younger. We don't need to be adding over the hill players until our team proves they are a close to competing for a championship and need a player or two to get over the top. But as of now, the defense looks atrocious and who knows how a new playcaller will affect the future outlook. I'd rather pay and/or draft a young guy and give them the snaps.
 

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
62,692
Liked Posts:
40,162
No, I've watched every Bear game this season. Its just that on Sunday, I watched the Bears play the Niners, hence the 'confusing' wording of my post "After watching the Niners game".

Correct so you were only referring to the Niners game like I said.
 

Discus fish salesman

Well-known member
Joined:
Mar 31, 2018
Posts:
15,839
Liked Posts:
20,539
I watched the Tx-Ga game on Saturday.....Tx's O-line was getting beat pretty good throughout the game. Not sure I want da Bears 1st pick to be a O-lineman from Texas. But it was only one game. Carter from Penn. ST. looks good. Maybe him as 1st pick. Again only time I saw him play. All feed back welcomed.
Banks wasn't playing but he was pretty bad in the previous game vs. Ga
 

DefNextYear

Well-known member
Joined:
Jan 21, 2024
Posts:
1,921
Liked Posts:
1,677
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
I'd be on board with bringing Pryor back with what he's shown. He's a great depth piece and probably will end up starting. Overall, it's a reasonable way to go about the offseason.
 

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
62,692
Liked Posts:
40,162
Banks wasn't playing but he was pretty bad in the previous game vs. Ga
The first GA was the only sack and QB hit he has given up all year. Otherwise he has 0 sacks, 0 hits and 4 hurries rest of year.
 

TheEarlofRobin

Active member
Joined:
Sep 23, 2024
Posts:
896
Liked Posts:
413
Correct so you were only referring to the Niners game like I said.
Of course its correct. I am telling you what I did on Sunday. You couldn't possibly know otherwise. Again, I wasn't watching every 2024 Bears game at the same time, I was watching the Niners....which I referenced in my post. The confusion is all your own doing.
 

didshereallysaythat

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 14, 2011
Posts:
21,158
Liked Posts:
10,014
Of course its correct. I am telling you what I did on Sunday. You couldn't possibly know otherwise. Again, I wasn't watching every 2024 Bears game at the same time, I was watching the Niners....which I referenced in my post. The confusion is all your own doing.
Remy knows what you did last Sunday.
 

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
62,692
Liked Posts:
40,162
Of course its correct. I am telling you what I did on Sunday. You couldn't possibly know otherwise. Again, I wasn't watching every 2024 Bears game at the same time, I was watching the Niners....which I referenced in my post. The confusion is all your own doing.

Correct you overreacted to one game like I said.
 

TheEarlofRobin

Active member
Joined:
Sep 23, 2024
Posts:
896
Liked Posts:
413
Correct you overreacted to one game like I said.
No, that is incorrect. I had watched the whole season up to that point, but on Sunday the Bears only played the Niners. That was the only game on their schedule. So when I said "after watching the Niners game", that was a statement of fact. I had indeed just watched the Bears played the Niners.

Did the Bears decide to fire Eberflus after the Lions game? Is that also an example of "overreacting to one game"? Maybe you and your PFF cronies have the ability to watch multiple Bears games all at once, but I do not have that ability.
 

Washington

Well-known member
Joined:
Mar 22, 2016
Posts:
3,919
Liked Posts:
2,939
No, that is incorrect. I had watched the whole season up to that point, but on Sunday the Bears only played the Niners. That was the only game on their schedule. So when I said "after watching the Niners game", that was a statement of fact. I had indeed just watched the Bears played the Niners.

Did the Bears decide to fire Eberflus after the Lions game? Is that also an example of "overreacting to one game"? Maybe you and your PFF cronies have the ability to watch multiple Bears games all at once, but I do not have that ability.

Dude, you are trying to match wits with an unarmed man. You are definitely correct here.

Even the close losses were embarrassing for the organization in how they played out. Need we mention the complete embarrassment of the NE game too, a team people have ranked in the bottom of the league.

This is a culmination of complete horse shit from a horse shit team and organization and not an overreaction to 1 game.
 

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
62,692
Liked Posts:
40,162
No, that is incorrect. I had watched the whole season up to that point, but on Sunday the Bears only played the Niners. That was the only game on their schedule. So when I said "after watching the Niners game", that was a statement of fact. I had indeed just watched the Bears played the Niners.

Did the Bears decide to fire Eberflus after the Lions game? Is that also an example of "overreacting to one game"? Maybe you and your PFF cronies have the ability to watch multiple Bears games all at once, but I do not have that ability.
The Bears never claimed they fired Flus based on one game. By contrast you said the following.

Watching the putrid effort against the Niners, I would be against bringing anyone back. They need to blow it up and try to get a different mix of players, even if just for a cohesion/locker room atmosphere effect. This team is lifeless and will never amount to anything as it currently stands.
If I missed where you referenced any game other than the Niners then let me know. Otherwise the impression one gets from the above is your decision was based on just the Niners game. I appreciate that may not be your intent but that is how it reads.
 

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
62,692
Liked Posts:
40,162
And you didn’t overreact to the incredibly small sample size of what 3 games as OC was it?

No because I never claimed Brown should be HC based on those 3 games. I said IF Caleb finished the season strong which would be 8 games that it would be a Bears thing to do to hire him.

By contrast the poster said he watched the Niners and would not bring anyone back and would effectively gut the whole team ie players not just coaches.

Thr Bears need OL, DL and good coaching. They dont need a whole new rebuild which is what the poster appeared to be suggesting.
 

TheEarlofRobin

Active member
Joined:
Sep 23, 2024
Posts:
896
Liked Posts:
413
If I missed where you referenced any game other than the Niners then let me know. Otherwise the impression one gets from the above is your decision was based on just the Niners game. I appreciate that may not be your intent but that is how it reads.
Yeah, imagine if I've been lying this whole time, and the only time I watched the Bears in my lifetime was Sunday's game against the Niners. You'd actually be right!
 

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
62,692
Liked Posts:
40,162
Yeah, imagine if I've been lying this whole time, and t⁸he only time I watched the Bears in my lifetime was Sunday's game against the Niners. You'd actually be right!

I responded to what you actually said. You did not say your decision was based on all the other games you watched.
 

TheEarlofRobin

Active member
Joined:
Sep 23, 2024
Posts:
896
Liked Posts:
413
I responded to what you actually said. You did not say your decision was based on all the other games you watched.
And I did not say it was only based on the Niners game. But, as has been referenced numerous times already....the Bears did play the Niners on Sunday, the Bears did not play other NFL teams on Sunday, and, as stated, after watching the putrid effort against the Niners I concluded, based on my vast knowledge of NFL history and my vast knowledge of watching the Bears for decades and, more specifically, my vast knowledge of the 2024 Bears, that, indeed, the Bears need to get new players!
 

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
62,692
Liked Posts:
40,162
And I did not say it was only based on the Niners game. But, as has been referenced numerous times already....the Bears did play the Niners on Sunday, the Bears did not play other NFL teams on Sunday, and, as stated, after watching the putrid effort against the Niners I concluded, based on my vast knowledge of NFL history and my vast knowledge of watching the Bears for decades and, more specifically, my vast knowledge of the 2024 Bears, that, indeed, the Bears need to get new players!

The way your sentence was structured clearly did suggest it was based on the Niners game.

If you say after doing A, you believe B then the implication is that A is the cause of B. Not sure what to tell you.
 

TheEarlofRobin

Active member
Joined:
Sep 23, 2024
Posts:
896
Liked Posts:
413
The way your sentence was structured clearly did suggest it was based on the Niners game.

It was. Had the Bears gone out an beaten the Niners 40-3, I would have thought differently. They didn't and put up their worst effort of the year.

Funny how the brain works, no? Tipping points, straws breaking camels backs, and so forth.
 

Top