- Joined:
- Oct 19, 2013
- Posts:
- 7,956
- Liked Posts:
- 829
- Location:
- Wish You Were Here
Niemi cried the same river.
After a night's sleep, I still don't get an aspect of this trade:
Assuming Saad wanted too much--fine, we move him for guys who can help us now--and we did in the case of A² and Dano. Assuming A² is slotted with Kane and T² and the fact he's score 20 before doesn't put a breakout year out of plausibility--and I like what I've read about Dano. It hurts losing our 2nd best defensive player after Hossa, but it's managable.
I also get the fact that Paliotta and Tropp were sweeteners. But I sill cannot fathom why in the smeg Bowman got Morin back. To me this is the fail of the trade. Morin's relationship (or lack thereof) with the 'hawks doesn't really even qualify him as a sweetener on any trade, and it's not like Q's going to play him (even though while here I didn't consider him that bad or that good--and Q's played worse frequently). It's like Bowman also got back a bag of dehydrated water. Was there not anyone else in Columbus' system that he could have got instead? Did the deal hing of us taking Morin back?
That aspect eludes me in terms of "why?" Sure, he may not take any cap but he takes up a contract slot--and one that likley won't be used. We might as well have gotten Vorobiev back.
You would have to think Bowman talked to Q about Morin coming back and asked him if he'd take him. If Q said no, Morin wouldn't even have been part of the deal.
Sent from my Texas Instrument Calculator
maybe some of these guys might be added in trades of bik and sharp
I never said he was miserable. Rosival was miserable until the Minny series this year. Zyuzin was miserable. Pisani was miserable. Versteeg in 2014 was miserable. O'donnel was miserable. Cullimore was miserable.Maybe Morin wasn't as miserable as fans think he was?
You'd think, but historically Q and Bowman have not always been on the same page.You would have to think Bowman talked to Q about Morin coming back and asked him if he'd take him. If Q said no, Morin wouldn't even have been part of the deal.
Sent from my Texas Instrument Calculator
You'd think, but historically Q and Bowman have not always been on the same page.
I never said he was miserable. Rosival was miserable until the Minny series this year. Zyuzin was miserable. Pisani was miserable. Versteeg in 2014 was miserable. O'donnel was miserable. Cullimore was miserable.
I said Morin was not that bad and not that good. Q has played worse than him but Q has historically refused to play him. My take has nothijng to do with what I think Morin can or can't bring to the table--it's more like why would Stan get a player that Q would refuse to play?
You'd think, but historically Q and Bowman have not always been on the same page.
Remember the 2012 interviews after Phoenix knocked us out? Q was off in left field and Bowman was off on Mars in terms of what went wrong. Speculation had it in 2013 that Bowman was giving Q just enough rope to hang himself--which he didn't and there was much rejoying and F-bombing.
For all we know Stan didn't even talk to Q and just did the deal.
If that was the case Kane & Leddy wouldn't have lasted as long as they did.Miserable as in unhappy. Q expects a full ice game and players to be able to play without the puck. Something Morin still has to learn. Everyone assumed Q has an agenda against him and Morin was unhappy. Maybe Morin just needs to continue to work on his game and improve. He was traded because if they sent him down, they feared he would get picked up for nothing on waivers.
Yeah I've seen many BJs fans (i just realized that's what they are) say they would of rather had Rychel traded over Dano, and Rychel is the prospect with a ton of hype thrown around him but he was also in trade rumor possibilities all offseason like some potential scenarios for them to have traded up to Arizona's #3 pick.
If Morin produced as much as either of those two, Q would live with deficiencies. But many of times, Leddy found himself on the bench too.
I'm a fan of BJ's