bruinsfan37
New member
- Joined:
- Jun 9, 2013
- Posts:
- 27
- Liked Posts:
- 0
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="GrimlockAutobot" data-cid="199995" data-time="1370886167">
Quick is the best goaltender in the game. Better than Rask. Better than Crawford.
He had a bad series because the Hawks were so good. Not the other way around.
If the Hawks can make the game's best goalie look mortal then they can and will get some goals off of Rask.</p></blockquote>
Quick to me played poorly in games 2 and 5 against the hawks. To me it also seemed that with the exception of game 2 the hawks really struggled against LA. Most games were decided by 1 goal, and if the hawks struggled to score goals against LA they will also struggle against boston. Rask is a young goalie coming of age, with .75 or so GAA against pitt.
Quick is the best goaltender in the game. Better than Rask. Better than Crawford.
He had a bad series because the Hawks were so good. Not the other way around.
If the Hawks can make the game's best goalie look mortal then they can and will get some goals off of Rask.</p></blockquote>
Quick to me played poorly in games 2 and 5 against the hawks. To me it also seemed that with the exception of game 2 the hawks really struggled against LA. Most games were decided by 1 goal, and if the hawks struggled to score goals against LA they will also struggle against boston. Rask is a young goalie coming of age, with .75 or so GAA against pitt.