SCF - 6/15 Game 2: Bruins (0) vs (1) Blackhawks 7:00PM NBCS

the canadian dream

New member
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
6,402
Liked Posts:
14
Hawks turn to shit after that goal against. momentum anyone?</p>


 </p>


I cant stand our PP..can't fucking stand it. Can't stand how they enter the zone or how they show little urgency to. Hate how they don't move their legs..hate the units...hate how they always resort to the right side...hate how our pointmen handle the puck. Hate it all. </p>


 </p>


I don't want this game coming down to that 1st period none goal if the Hawks end up losing. I don't want to hear the same recycled garbage as an excuse.</p>
 

roshinaya

fnord
Donator
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
3,533
Liked Posts:
440
Should have put in some more goals in that first period. Is a whole new ballgame now with Boston having all the momentum. The Hawks abysmal PP isn't helping either. Boston probably going to score on the PP to open the third.</p>
 

Variable

New member
Joined:
Jul 24, 2010
Posts:
3,023
Liked Posts:
122
Power play isn't even good enough to expect 2 minutes of no threatening from the other team anymore. ****.</p>
 

the canadian dream

New member
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
6,402
Liked Posts:
14
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Variable" data-cid="201084" data-time="1371348617">


Power play isn't even good enough to expect 2 minutes of no threatening from the other team anymore. ****.</p>
</blockquote>



the first one of the game was really good. moving the puck quickly..moving their legs etc etc. not sure why we that just goes away. winning a faceoff for possession probably would help instead of having the first 30 secs of the pp killed instantly with having to retrieve the puck then trying to gain a clogged up bluelune by skating through it. This team certainly never dumps and chases on the pp which is a shame. I still think that can be effective..back the Bruins up when you do that.



hawks faceoffs have become an issue in the attacking zone again on the pp.</p>


 </p>


3rd period is pretty much OT. next goal wins this.</p>
 

Maiden

New member
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
1,148
Liked Posts:
0
so frustrating to watch. Outshooting them 23-6 half way thru this game. Have 4 shots since.</p>


What happened to our killer instinct to put teams away.</p>
 

Variable

New member
Joined:
Jul 24, 2010
Posts:
3,023
Liked Posts:
122
TRY GETTING A RESERVATION AT DORSIA NOW YOU STUPID FUCKING BASTARD!!!</p>
 

MassHavoc

Moderator
Staff member
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
17,882
Liked Posts:
2,565
**** YOU DIRECTV YOU PIECE OF SHIT FUCKING WHORE CUTTING OUT IN OT TO COME B ACK WITH A BRUINS WIN</p>
 

Ashor-redtribe

New member
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
1,654
Liked Posts:
0
Location:
Schaumburg
Nice clear there Bollig, you were the difference oh right!</p>
 

Rex

Chief Blackcock
Joined:
Jul 17, 2010
Posts:
3,447
Liked Posts:
449
Location:
Grimson's Sweet Ass
That was the worst fucking OT ever. I'm getting really tired of the "Rope a Dope" Overtime Strategy</p>


 </p>


and out Toews and Kane together FOR **** SAKES!</p>
 

Variable

New member
Joined:
Jul 24, 2010
Posts:
3,023
Liked Posts:
122
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="MassHavoc" data-cid="201092" data-time="1371353832">
<div>


**** YOU DIRECTV YOU PIECE OF SHIT FUCKING WHORE CUTTING OUT IN OT TO COME B ACK WITH A BRUINS WIN</p>
</div>
</blockquote>


 </p>


If it makes you feel any better, my technology failed me as well. **** Dish Network.</p>
 

the canadian dream

New member
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
6,402
Liked Posts:
14
that was a character win for the bruins.


hawks need to show up for more than one period and def need to show up for ot.


dont want to hear about the none goal in the first. wasnt the reason for the loss..besides good teams overcome bad calls right? or does that only apply when one wants it to?


get one in boston. two will be tough. this is going to be a long series.
 

roshinaya

fnord
Donator
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
3,533
Liked Posts:
440
Boston steadily improved after their shit first period and the Hawks got slower and dumber. Boston deservedly won this game, Hawks had nothing in the OT. Knew that the missed opportunity in the first would come back and bite them in the ass. I wonder if these longer games are a disadvantage to the Hawks as they got noticeably slower as the game went on and their speed is their lifeblood. Hope not, if it it's the case, I foresee trouble.</p>


 </p>


Hawks need to take the next game in Boston, otherwise it will be that much harder going forward.</p>
 

Ashor-redtribe

New member
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
1,654
Liked Posts:
0
Location:
Schaumburg
I really can't see us winning a game in Boston, they look tough. I don't like our chances in this series. We can't even cross the blueline with out getting hammered..they had all day in our zone setting it up. But congratz to Bollig as he was clearly the best player out there.</p>
 

Maiden

New member
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
1,148
Liked Posts:
0
How does Kane and Sharp play less than Bolland and Shaw? WTF Q!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>


Tonight looked like wrestling out there. Play great early and lay down to the finish.</p>
 

Variable

New member
Joined:
Jul 24, 2010
Posts:
3,023
Liked Posts:
122
Now, now, don't become like the Bizarro World PMX with hockey thoughts equally as bad, except on the other end of the spectrum. Like I said, a lot of things have to go wrong in the game before you can start pointing the finger at a player like Bollig.</p>
 

roshinaya

fnord
Donator
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
3,533
Liked Posts:
440
Hawks looked like ass for most of the game and especially OT, to blame it on one player is dumb. Hawks are a resilient bunch and to write them off like that is premature.</p>
 

roshinaya

fnord
Donator
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
3,533
Liked Posts:
440
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Maiden" data-cid="201099" data-time="1371354798">
<div>


How does Kane and Sharp play less than Bolland and Shaw? WTF Q!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>


Tonight looked like wrestling out there. Play great early and lay down to the finish.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>


 </p>


I thought the Shaw line and the Krüger line had more pressure in the O-zone than the big guns (or more like BB guns the way they've played).</p>
 

Top