- Joined:
- Aug 21, 2012
- Posts:
- 29,775
- Liked Posts:
- 24,340
- Location:
- USA
Cutting Trubisky didn’t raise their desperation meter.Steelers only have Pickett on the roster.
They do need a better qb, but it’s not because they cut Trubisky
Cutting Trubisky didn’t raise their desperation meter.Steelers only have Pickett on the roster.
No one said it did. It was said it increased their imperative which from a pure numbers standpoint is true. It is of vital importance (definition of imperative) they add a QB to the roster because they only have one.Cutting Trubisky didn’t raise their desperation meter.
They do need a better qb, but it’s not because they cut Trubisky
I responded to someone who said the Steelers are desperate now. So yes someone did say it.No one said it did. It was said it increased their imperative which from a pure numbers standpoint is true. It is of vital importance (definition of imperative) they add a QB to the roster because theybonly have one.
I responded to someone who said the Steelers are desperate now. So yes someone did say it.
Steelers just released Trubinsky which makes Steelers QB search even more imperative
We cut Trubisky. We are now in desperate need of a qb.
Cutting Trubisky does not make it more desperate or even imperative. Trubisky was not an important loss. That’s my point. Many teams get new QBs every year.No you didnt. The poster never used the word desperate. You did.
Imperative does not mean desperate. It means like I said vitally important. And once again it is vitally important for a team with only one QB on the roster to add another one or 2. Doesnt mean they are desperate but is simply a function of numbers.
You changed the word and then argued with yourself about Trubisky not affecting their desperation levels.
But way back in the day the Steelers released two other HOF quarterbacks they drafted, John Unitas and Len Dawson.Yes the organization with 2 HOF QB’s. One is Terry Bradshaw while the other is Big Ben
FifyBut one person can be incontinent . @DanielCCSBears
Cutting Trubisky does not make it more desperate or even imperative. Trubisky was not an important loss. That’s my point. Many teams get new QBs every year.
Oh and…..
- adjective
showing extreme urgency or intensity especially because of great need or desire
“felt a desperate urge to confess”
“a desperate need for recognition”
synonyms:imperative
requiring attention or action
I could be wrong, but I remember the conversation being the opposite and that he's a fan.I'm fairly positive that Arthur Smith was said to not like Fields as a fit for his offense when he was in Atlanta
He's not the HC, if Tomlin wants him, he'll have to take him.I'm fairly positive that Arthur Smith was said to not like Fields as a fit for his offense when he was in Atlanta
I'm fairly positive that Arthur Smith was said to not like Fields as a fit for his offense when he was in Atlanta
Ultimately I suppose everything is hearsay, we shall see what the Steelers offer and if Poles makes the moveI could be wrong, but I remember the conversation being the opposite and that he's a fan.
It was talked about during the trade deadline options, I can't find a link but I stand by my statement of what I heard. Either way Smith and the Falcons passed on Fields in the draft for a TE and a old Matt Ryan, so they definitely weren't too high on Justin then.The Falcons drafted Ridder so the idea that Fields is not a fit defies logic.
Cant find anything that would suggest he is not a fit.
It is imperative for any team with one QB on the roster to add more QBs. You are trying to squeeze your original erroneous assumption that desperation was mentioned into the reality that it was not.
Desperation can drive someone's imperative but something can be imperative without being driven by desperation.
In this case the imperative to add a QB can be driven by the fact they only have one QB on the roster. It is not required the fact they only have one QB on the roster to invoke feelings of desperation.
Further I poster did not mention them being desperate to which you claimed they did. They clearly did not use the word. They used another word that you interpretend to be comparable to desperation.
It was talked about during the trade deadline options, I can't find a link but I stand by my statement of what I heard. Either way Smith and the Falcons passed on Fields in the draft for a TE and a old Matt Ryan, so they definitely weren't too high on Justin then.
I doubt that most in ATL were banking on Ryan long term, Justin would have gotten a year at most to develop and would have made more sense than Kyle Pitts. Either way, it will be interesting and irritating to see how this all plays out over the next couple monthsThe Falcons stuck with Ryan because he was a franchise QB coming off throwing for 4500 yards which ranked 4th in the NFL. Arthur Smith would immediately turn Atl against him if he had dumped Ryan right after taking the job.