Sports Illustrated predicts Bears record....ouch

[gwharris2254]

2-12-2















TWO to 12 for TWO TDs

 

[JUSTWIN]

I'll take the bet on the over with any of you dumbfucks.

 

[ijustposthere]

0-19. 31st pick in the draft.

 

[sevvy]

People still read Sports Illustrated?

Only Peter King does.

 

[sevvy]

I cannot see this team finishing worse than last year because of Trubisky's development and the new WRs that defenses have to at least respect. Worst case scenario, the WRs make it so defenders cannot stack the box and Jordan Howard has a monster year. There's no reason we cannot be .500.

What I think might happen is that Matt Nagy, his system, and our WRs are being overrated by a portion of the fan base, and if we fail to break .500, we'll have to listen to the "it takes time to gel" excuses for another calendar year. I believe if our team is going to be playoff bound, we'll finish .500 or above this year. If not, we are going to be in for a lot of mediocre seasons with plenty of fan excuses until everyone finally falls off the wagon and Pace is fired.

You need to temper those expectations.

 

[Icculus]

SI is obsolete. Only time I look at SI is when I want to see some pussy.

You know you're on the Internet, right?

 

[hebs]

You know you're on the Internet, right?

Not all countries allow websurfing to porn sites. (Saudi, Kuwait, Qatar, UAE, etc) They basically monitor all non-vpn traffic. Infact, they block access to a lot of VPN websites as well. (The kind where you go to download the VPN software)

 

[nc0gnet0]

So, essentially any news organization that reports less than glowing reports/predictions for the Bears is either trash, or obsolete.
Green Bay is going downhill, the Lions are trash, yet the Bears play in the toughest division in football.

Can someone tell me which news organizations are still good?

 

[Spunky Porkstacker]

So, essentially any news organization that reports less than glowing reports/predictions for the Bears is either trash, or obsolete.
Green Bay is going downhill, the Lions are trash, yet the Bears play in the toughest division in football.

Can someone tell me which news organizations are still good?

Any that are in Detroit?

 

[nc0gnet0]

Any that are in Detroit?

Like this one?

https://www.freep.com/story/sports/...-lions-matt-patricia-shawn-windsor/689243002/

 

[Black Rainbow]

So, essentially any news organization that reports less than glowing reports/predictions for the Bears is either trash, or obsolete.
Green Bay is going downhill, the Lions are trash, yet the Bears play in the toughest division in football.

Can someone tell me which news organizations are still good?

Right? I point out ONE inconsistency in someone's posting and they get defensive and go into hissy-fit mode and start threatening to put me on ignore - haha. Go the phuc ahead.

 

[Spunky Porkstacker]

Like this one?

https://www.freep.com/story/sports/...-lions-matt-patricia-shawn-windsor/689243002/

Funny stuff, Lions will be the new Patriots because they run sprints to stay sharp 6 weeks before TC starts. The gains in conditioning will be gone for most of those players unless they work to maintain any gains they had between now and TC. So MP is sending a message to the team. Stafford is the new Brady, Lions are destined for the SB...woot woot

 

[Spunky Porkstacker]

So, essentially any news organization that reports less than glowing reports/predictions for the Bears is either trash, or obsolete.
Green Bay is going downhill, the Lions are trash, yet the Bears play in the toughest division in football.

Can someone tell me which news organizations are still good?

Really though there was a lot of disagreement in the replies to the SI article but you paint it as if all who responded expect all pre season predictions should have the Bears winning an unrealistic amount of games.

 

[nc0gnet0]

Really though there was a lot of disagreement in the replies to the SI article but you paint it as if all who responded expect all pre season predictions should have the Bears winning an unrealistic amount of games.

LOL, Are you denying that the credibility of the source directly correlates to the personal beliefs of the person posting? It's really getting laughable, Bleacher Report/SI/ESPN is shit, well unless they post a positive Bears article, or a negative article on a division opponent, in which case they are credible, and vice versa. Your having a good time with the Carlos Monarrez article, but did you know he predicted a sweep of the Bears in a previous article (not that I wouldn't have a good time with it a bit, lol)?

But all things aside, seriously, which news outlets to posters find the most trustworthy, I am curious.....

 

[Spunky Porkstacker]

I really don't rely on the media hyperbole, I look at the facts and decide for myself. I like the changes, time will tell though, Bears could be 6-10 or if the stars align 10-6 this season.

As far as MP putting the Lions through sprints who fucking knows. He's no BB. I think it's too early for that, he should be able to verbalize his message in OTAs and hit them in TC if he's seeing the need, JMHO. Conditioning never hurts but comparing results from sprints to NE is laughable.

 

[onebud34]

This list looks pretty predictable...good teams will always be good and bad teams will always be bad. But we all know that's not how it usually plays out.

Is Sports Illustrated now the pseudo ESPN?

 

[Visionman]

Time to block the Lions troll, i think. Ommy adds more to this board than him...

 

[nc0gnet0]

I really don't rely on the media hyperbole, I look at the facts and decide for myself. I like the changes, time will tell though, Bears could be 6-10 or if the stars align 10-6 this season.

As far as MP putting the Lions through sprints who fucking knows. He's no BB. I think it's too early for that, he should be able to verbalize his message in OTAs and hit them in TC if he's seeing the need, JMHO. Conditioning never hurts but comparing results from sprints to NE is laughable.

So, he is not BB, but another poster suggests that he is in fact Mangini, Wies, or Crennel. LOl. Time will tell.

I'd really like to here more on this:

But all things aside, seriously, which news outlets to posters find the most trustworthy, I am curious.....

 

[nc0gnet0]

Time to block the Lions troll, i think. Ommy adds more to this board than him...

Coming from a poster that has never added a single football thought to any thread, just likes to talk smack. Glad to see I am still living rent free in that tiny brain of yours.

 

[Spunky Porkstacker]

So, he is not BB, but another poster suggests that he is in fact Mangini, Wies, or Crennel. LOl. Time will tell.

I'd really like to here more on this:

But all things aside, seriously, which news outlets to posters find the most trustworthy, I am curious.....

News outlets and trustworthy is funny. I don't have one for you.