TGDT: 10/20 Canucks @ Blackhawks 8:00PM CSN/TSN

[Ashor-redtribe]

[quote name="Ton"]I don't know, a rule like that would be very judgmental for officiating to decide.



Building off that thought, I think it might make sense to have running time if a team has a powerplay at the end of the game -- but even that has complications that might not work.[/quote]





Ton, don't bother the way out of that is time expired. they already used that on me.

 

[MassHavoc]

[quote name="Ton"]I don't know, a rule like that would be very judgmental for officiating to decide.



Building off that thought, I think it might make sense to have running time if a team has a powerplay at the end of the game -- but even that has complications that might not work.[/quote]

Instead of running the clock over, maybe some penalties within the last minute of the game should be Penalty shots instead of a powerplay. Or something like that.

 

[Ton]

[quote name="MassHavoc"]

Instead of running the clock over, maybe some penalties within the last minute of the game should be Penalty shots instead of a powerplay. Or something like that.[/quote]



If the NHL really wanted to increase scoring... lol.



Honestly, I don't really like the idea of any of these, but I'm just saying I can see something like that happening under Bettman.

 

[Chief Walking Stick]

[quote name="Ton"]



If the NHL really wanted to increase scoring... lol.



Honestly, I don't really like the idea of any of these, but I'm just saying I can see something like that happening under Bettman.[/quote]



I don't see anything wrong with letting time on the PP to finish if a penalty is committed with under 2 minutes left in a tied or one goal game. Just have the extra time be like over time and next goal wins regardless of which team scores it.

 

[Ton]

[quote name="Stu Grimson"]



I don't see anything wrong with letting time on the PP to finish if a penalty is committed with under 2 minutes left in a tied or one goal game. Just have the extra time be like over time and next goal wins regardless of which team scores it.[/quote]



Well, one thing would be teams down by a goal in the dying seconds of the game purposely committing a penalty in order to gain a little bit of time.

 

[Chief Walking Stick]

[quote name="Ton"]



Well, one thing would be teams down by a goal in the dying seconds of the game purposely committing a penalty in order to gain a little bit of time.[/quote]



I forgot to add that it would have to be the team in the lead committing the penalty.



Already in a game this year, I can't remember if it was the Hawks or another team i was watching (might have been NYR) someone got slashed really hard on the hands with like 4.9 seconds left and the team didn't get to benefit on a power play by the dirty slash.



PPs already roll over from period to period, why should it be any different for the 3rd period? Time not being extended is just as if PP time didn't transfer from the 1st - 2nd period and so on...

 

[winos5]

[quote name="Stu Grimson"]Question for you goalies (and I only saw the replay once, I'll have to watch it again later):



On the goal that Turco gave up... he seemed to have his pads completely covering the left side of the net, but appeared to turn to his right which opened up like a 5-6" space where the Canucks tapped it in. Did he simply lose his ground or was he trying to get up?[/quote]



It was actually tapped in from the other side of the net by one of the Twins, don't recall which one. I think it was flipped over and through the crease by Samuellson. Not a fluke or soft goal in anyway. Bolland just missed getting to the puck first as it passed between Seabrooks legs.

 

[whalerhawk]

Just because Hossa was due up next in the shootout doesn't mean he would have scored. Luongo stoned him on a clear breakaway in the third period, didn't he?

 

[Chief Walking Stick]

[quote name="whalerhawk"]Just because Hossa was due up next in the shootout doesn't mean he would have scored. Luongo stoned him on a clear breakaway in the third period, didn't he?[/quote]



I loved the call "And here comes Hossa, with the game on his stick!"



But yea, Luongo did stone him.

 

[MassHavoc]

[quote name="whalerhawk"]Just because Hossa was due up next in the shootout doesn't mean he would have scored. Luongo stoned him on a clear breakaway in the third period, didn't he?[/quote]

You talking to yourself again?

 

[Guest]

[quote name="whalerhawk"]Just because Hossa was due up next in the shootout doesn't mean he would have scored. Luongo stoned him on a clear breakaway in the third period, didn't he?[/quote]





He was gassed. Barely had enough to get the shot off. You were at the game right?

 

[whalerhawk]

[quote name="MassHavoc"]

You talking to yourself again?[/quote]

No. Someone mentioned that Hossa coming up next in the shootout was game, set, match. I'm saying not necessarily.

You were at the game, right?

No, Lynn, Hunter and I are all sick and we were forced to miss it. Had to catch it on the tube.

 

[Guest]

[quote name="acco-redtribe"]





what ever man. Just a thought. Didn't know only Moderator opinions mattered.[/quote]





what does being a mod make it. I'd have said it either way. If I weren't a mod I'd have added other comment.



:dance:

 

[Guest]

[quote name="whalerhawk"]

No. Someone mentioned that Hossa coming up next in the shootout was game, set, match. I'm saying not necessarily.





No, Lynn, Hunter and I are all sick and we were forced to miss it. Had to catch it on the tube.[/quote]





Yea he was out there for an extended shift and definitely out of gas. Although Louongo made a good save.



All three of you are sick? Yuk! Stay HOME!

 

[5Minutes4Fighting]

I’m not trying to stir up 10 pages of unnecessary Scott discussion, but I like this quote from Scott in today’s Sun-Times: “Last year I really beat up on one of their guys bad [Alex Bolduc] and put him out for the season. So I’ve always battled with these guys. I’m always willing to [mix it up], especially with Vancouver. I don’t like that team.”



-5Minutes

 

[BiscuitintheBasket]

[quote name="acco-redtribe"]Last night when bolland had the breakaway in the last seconds then time expired, I had mentioned in the chat that in all seriousness they should have the team with the breakaway continue even as time expires. but only on a break away almost like a shootout distance. What do you all think?? :think:[/quote]





Hmm, even with defined distances, lengths, it is too subjective. What is truly a break-away? How far to do you need to be from the opponents? What if the opponents catch up?



Fundamentally this is a time based sport and play/time is constant other than between whistles. When time expires, time is up. Just like it is in just about every other time based sport....



...I know that in Football if there is one second on the clock and a team runs a play the the play keeps going past the 1 second as long as the play is still active. But keep in mind the clock does not stop for each whistle, and unlike every other time based sport there is not constant play when time is running. It is more of a "move" based sport.



I really do not see a rule like that applying and being able to be called correctly as an extension of play in the NHL.

 

[Guest]

My problem with Scott last night was there was a time in the 3rd perioed where Bieksa had the puck behind our net and Scott had the perfect chance to just quash him and he didn't. If you arent going to hit, you can't skate backwards and only play 3 minutes, what purpose do you have?

 

[MassHavoc]

[quote name="R K"]My problem with Scott last night was there was a time in the 3rd perioed where Bieksa had the puck behind our net and Scott had the perfect chance to just quash him and he didn't. If you arent going to hit, you can't skate backwards and only play 3 minutes, what purpose do you have?[/quote]

Yeah but with the game that close if he would have hit the guy anything could have happen, as we all know they like to give penalties for hitting too hard. If he would have hit the guy hard and it led to a goal somehow he would have been lambasted.

 

[BlackHawkPaul]

[quote name="whalerhawk"]Just because Hossa was due up next in the shootout doesn't mean he would have scored. Luongo stoned him on a clear breakaway in the third period, didn't he?[/quote]

Guess I should have used durple.

 

[Chief Walking Stick]

[quote name="5Minutes4Fighting"]I’m not trying to stir up 10 pages of unnecessary Scott discussion, but I like this quote from Scott in today’s Sun-Times: “Last year I really beat up on one of their guys bad [Alex Bolduc] and put him out for the season. So I’ve always battled with these guys. I’m always willing to [mix it up], especially with Vancouver. I don’t like that team.”



-5Minutes[/quote]



Too bad none of the pussies on the Blues and Canucks will fight him... especially the Canucks after they saw what he did to Bolduc.