- Joined:
- May 17, 2010
- Posts:
- 13,947
- Liked Posts:
- 3,118
I mean I guess my point of contention here has always just been it really doesn't matter if Bonifacio hasn't always been a useful offensive player because he's been far and away a more useful player than Barney. Like I said, I've never said Bonifacio was amazing. His peak is probably to be an average MLB player unless he some how sustains the 2011. Barney is a good glove and nothing else. Honestly, I just don't see the argument to be made for Barney as an every day player where as there is at least an outside shot if not better one for Bonifacio as an every day player.
If you want to argue Murphy/Valbuena vs Bonifacio I think that is a much better debate. But the way I see it is Barney doesn't provide any offense. He doesn't provide much if any flexibility defensively. All he provides is a good glove at 2B. On the contrary, Bonifacio provides super-utility, average defense and potentially average-above average offense not to mention if he doesn't start he also is a great bench player with his speed being able to pinch run. Hell, Bonifacio is also a good back up case for Sweeney/Lake/OF extravaganza.
So again, if the trade is Barney for Bonifacio straight up I'm taking that deal every day of the week.
Well this is where we are far apart. I want Bonifacio on the Cubs, but I want to give up less to roll the dice on him recovering that magic. I don't love Barney by any stretch, but if he is what he was from 2011-2012 that is basically the realistic projections for Bonifacio. The question is what outliers do you want to believe in, Barney's 2013 or Bonifacio's 2011? Which one of those is closer to each players true talent level pretty much explains why the gap in projections of 18 points of OBP seems like 20-30 to you and more 10-20 to me.
Barney also certainly could play more than 2B if asked to do so, but due to his extreme defensive value he rarely is asked to move.