run and shoot
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Apr 28, 2013
- Posts:
- 16,254
- Liked Posts:
- 4,381
My favorite teams
What the fuck is a New England approach to QB development? Get lucky and draft the GOAT in the 6th round and then ride him for two decades?
Ok so I'm not gonna do research on what or how G.B. was compensated for every Qb that was drafted, developed and traded. Matt Hasselbeck was a former Packer. Look him up. The Packes have been developing Qb's going back to Don Majkowski & Lynn Dickey . As for Taylor, my point is that he'd be a low cost, competent Qb option.
Starting with Jimmy G. look up some of the Qb's who've past through N.E. Look up Matt Casell. Go back to Jim Plunkett
You won't do the research because the research is not favorable to your argument. I don't need to look those players up, I know who they are. And they have nothing to do with the Packers current organization. Lynn Dickey was drafted by Houston and sucked his whole career. Don Majkowski sucked too and left GB as a free agent.
Since Rodgers was drafted they've drafted 6 QBs, all of whom have been bad (including a second rounder who never threw a single TD pass in the NFL), and got one 6th rounder in return.
NE results are a bit better because they have usually had a really good team that made their QB look better than they were, but only Garoppolo has had any real success anywhere else and I don't think most people would say he is a good NFL QB. Brissett and Cassel are meh to bad.
Sigh..... Majkowski was a decent Qb and had success against us. His career was never the same after being injured. I see u avoided discussing Matt Hasselbeck .
My point is over the yrs. G.B. and N.E. have had more success than us at Qb development. Going back to Jim McMahon we've really only drafted and developed Jim Harbaugh, Rex Grossman , Kyle Orton and Mitchell Trubisky .
As for Taylor, my point is that he'd be a smart, low cost, low turnover, competent Qb option.