DMelt36
Bolland > You
- Joined:
- May 27, 2010
- Posts:
- 13,969
- Liked Posts:
- 8,434
Whole thing is a circus.
This.
Whole thing is a circus.
You seem to have some problem dissociating separate claims... claims of presumed conspiracy and a claim of Kane being intentionally behind the process of it are separate claims.
Also it doesn't negate that tampering could be an action of one person and the attorney didn't proclaim it was certainly an action of multiple people. It wouldn't be a conspiracy in that case if that was his conclusions.
"Most crimes" are not rapes. DNA is crucial to a rape case. Embezzlement? Not so much. Tax evasion? Not so much. She has been on the Kane lynch mob since day one. Indeed as we speak shes having a meltdown on twitter as people call her out for trying to pretend the DNA evidence exonerating Kane is no big deal.
A person with a legal background in these types of cases explaining things =/= being on the Kane lynch mob
You guys keep concocting your conspiracy theories. It's a nice day here. I'm gonna go outside for a while.
She claims she was raped and was afraid to come forward. She's a crusader.
Stop being obtuse.
No I just have the ability to use reason. The only thing more unlikely than Kane masterminding an infiltration of both the PD and DNA lab to alter evidence would be people in both those agencies taking it upon themselves to spontaneously do it.
Tampering evidence can hurt EITHER side...not just hers.
Someone tampering it could have tried to implicate Kane after finding out he is innocent.
I think the Buffalo police outsourced to either the Keyston Kops, Cop Rock, or Reno 911.This case has been filled with false reporting and assumptions that nothing is absolute until the DA or police department says it is.
All I see from the presser today is the bag that the rape kit was in, that contains personal and confidential matter at this time, that needs to be tracked for its whereabouts at all time, some how just shows up at the accusers front door step and some of you don't see anything wrong with that. I in no way am blaming either side of this, but wondering how the **** the police who've kept this case so secretive, so much so that there is a gag order in place, can suddenly "lose" a piece of potential evidence like that.
To be honest, her lawyer has every right to wonder about the process if something like this happened. I mean there's a fucking protocol in place so it doesn't just show up somewhere randomly.
Sent from my Texas Instrument Calculator
Why would Kane discredit the evidence that clears him of rape?
If he payed off the lab and cops to change the DNA to clear him..