WCQF: Hawks Defeat Blues in 6 Games! (SERIES DISCUSSION)

[Chief Walking Stick]

Where is Rabid? Pouting that his team won?

 

[BiscuitintheBasket]

I believe he is strutting around in his lycra Blues suit

 

[MassHavoc]

They sure do like giving the business to Toews' head.</p>

 

[winos5]

Ott is a douchenozzle extrordinaire</p>

 

[EspoForever]

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="winos5" data-cid="226311" data-time="1397854465">

Ott is a douchenozzle extrordinaire</p></blockquote>

Always has been.

 

[supraman]

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Grimsäväinen" data-cid="226250" data-time="1397826804">
<div>


Blues in 7.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>


 </p>


Wings in 7.</p>

 

[Pez68]

Changing my vote to Blues in 5. This team just doesn't have it.</p>

 

[supraman]

I dont think all is lost yet. We lost two very tight games away, now we go home, I expect us to pick up two wins. Also as soon as Q stops experimenting we will find our offense. Seems like he does this every playoff, separating Toews and Kane and then reunited them and we go on a scoring tear</p>

 

[Pez68]

Q is the single biggest problem with this team. If he would just put the best players together and let them play, things would work themselves out just fine. Hell, if he would just ice the best roster(see ya Bollig, Handzus), this series is probably at least tied at 1-1...</p>


 </p>


**** him.</p>

 

[Chief Walking Stick]

Hawks are still winning this series. Win game seven in OT.


**** you guys the hawks were down 3 to 1 against Detroit last year and i KNEW the wings were going to win in seven.


That didn't happen thank god. Remember toews was spazzing out the first few games.

 

[roshinaya]

Sure hope the Hawks has gotten all the stupid out of their system and can get back to business and string together some wins. Without Seabs it's going to be more difficult, but they can absolutely do it. These have been incredibly close games and the losses have come more due to their own mistakes, the Blues have been good but not the reason for their wins. They are totally beatable when the Hawks concentrate on their own game and ignore what their opponent wants to do. I still think this team has what it takes to make a series out of it even if they fall behind 3 games. If they don't, then no biggie.</p>

 

[puckjim]

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Pez68" data-cid="226452" data-time="1397947566">

Q is the single biggest problem with this team. If he would just put the best players together and let them play, things would work themselves out just fine. Hell, if he would just ice the best roster(see ya Bollig, Handzus), this series is probably at least tied at 1-1...

 

**** him.</p></blockquote>


Agree. His ego can **** right off. Bollig and Handzus are worthless.


I blame Lispy to a certain extent. He allowed Quenneville his chew toys.

 

[Chief Walking Stick]

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="puckjim" data-cid="226464" data-time="1397950811">
<div>


Agree. His ego can **** right off. Bollig and Handzus are worthless.


I blame Lispy to a certain extent. He allowed Quenneville his chew toys.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>


 </p>


You aren't passed out yet?  LOL.</p>

 

[~rabid platypus~]

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Grimsäväinen" data-cid="226281" data-time="1397840484">
<div>


Where is Rabid? Pouting that his team won?</p>
</div>
</blockquote>


 </p>


I'm still recovering from that Seabrook hit, wow! Pretty unlucky for Seabs. Backes was going to get rocked anyways, but the pucked stopped moving, and Backes turned the wrong way and had his body lowered to try and retrieve it, and that made the hit seem worse than it was. Bad luck all around.</p>


 </p>


Am I stoked? Yes, but:</p>


1.) It is not truly a series until the home team loses.</p>


2.) We had to rely on 2 last minute goals to send us to overtime to win, so I'm not really that confident until we can pull out a good regulation win.</p>

 

[MassHavoc]

Bigger loss for this game, Backes or Seabrook?</p>

 

[BlackHawkPaul]

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="MassHavoc" data-cid="226748" data-time="1398100789">
<div>


Bigger loss for this game, Backes or Seabrook?</p>
</div>
</blockquote>


I'd rather have both of them playing so the bullshit excuse wagon isn't fired up on why either team loses/wins tonight.</p>

 

[The Count Dante]

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Pez68" data-cid="226452" data-time="1397947566">
<div>


Q is the single biggest problem with this team. If he would just put the best players together and let them play, things would work themselves out just fine. Hell, if he would just ice the best roster(see ya Bollig, Handzus), this series is probably at least tied at 1-1...</p>


 </p>


**** him.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>


 </p>


Just a reminder that Q has 706 more NHL ACTUAL coaching victories than anyone on this forum. </p>

 

[The Count Dante]

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="MassHavoc" data-cid="226748" data-time="1398100789">
<div>


Bigger loss for this game, Backes or Seabrook?</p>
</div>
</blockquote>


 </p>


Yes.</p>

 

[Chief Walking Stick]

Seabrook because... Brookbank.


Also Berglund is back today so the blues have that going for them

 

[Pez68]

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="The Deadliest Man Alive" data-cid="226754" data-time="1398102023">
<div>


Just a reminder that Q has 706 more NHL ACTUAL coaching victories than anyone on this forum. </p>
</div>
</blockquote>


 </p>


So he's beyond reproach or criticism? I really don't give a shit if he has 700 or 1. He is fucking up.</p>