Where do the Cubs Stand in the Division (Category Break-down)

Status
Not open for further replies.

DewsSox79

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 24, 2010
Posts:
29,059
Liked Posts:
7,249
I'm somewhat with CO on this... The eye test remembers the horribly ugly plays and forgets the plays that were made IMO

I remember the supposed great plays since I watch too much baseball, and those great plays that I recall, werent great, they looked great because he took horrible routes to the ball.
 

Captain Obvious

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Jul 31, 2010
Posts:
4,967
Liked Posts:
697
I remember the supposed great plays since I watch too much baseball, and those great plays that I recall, werent great, they looked great because he took horrible routes to the ball.

:turrible: You remember every play that Soriano made? Fascinating.
 

tbo41fan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
15,922
Liked Posts:
2,701
Location:
Chicago, IL
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Arizona Wildcats
How many times has that happened, then TBO?

Sabre is unreliable. In small sample sizes. The smallest sample size I used was 3 fucking years.

Sabre is always unreliable.


Take for example, UZR.

It takes into advantage what park you play in....so you can't always tell which ones are good or not because their numbers are scewed on where they play the most.

Who comes up with these park rankings? What do they base them off? It's OPINION, not fact.

Also, UZR according to fangraphs uses this:
DG (defensive games): The number of outs made by an average fielder at his position given the exact distribution of balls in play for that player divided by the number of outs an average player at that position makes per game.

It uses averages which, much like FIP can be influenced by guys with high or low numbers.
 

AddisonStation

YamaHama it's fright nite
Donator
Joined:
Nov 30, 2010
Posts:
1,613
Liked Posts:
434
Location:
Rocky Top
I remember the supposed great plays since I watch too much baseball, and those great plays that I recall, werent great, they looked great because he took horrible routes to the ball.

I never said anything about great plays.... I just said plays made....

All I'm saying is it is easier to remember sori's botched plays.
 

Captain Obvious

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Jul 31, 2010
Posts:
4,967
Liked Posts:
697
Sabre is always unreliable.


Take for example, UZR.

It takes into advantage what park you play in....so you can't always tell which ones are good or not because their numbers are scewed on where they play the most.

Who comes up with these park rankings? What do they base them off? It's OPINION, not fact.

Also, UZR according to fangraphs uses this:


It uses averages which, much like FIP can be influenced by guys with high or low numbers.

Ummm... the fact that it takes into account what park you play in, makes it even for all players.

Okay, so it uses an average. Why is that so bad? It uses an average and Soriano is above that... yet he sucks. That makes a fuckload of sense.
 

DewsSox79

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 24, 2010
Posts:
29,059
Liked Posts:
7,249
I never said anything about great plays.... I just said plays made....

All I'm saying is it is easier to remember sori's botched plays.

I agree with bold.

and my great plays comment was not directed at you personally. you know i love you.
 

tbo41fan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
15,922
Liked Posts:
2,701
Location:
Chicago, IL
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Arizona Wildcats
Ummm... the fact that it takes into account what park you play in, makes it even for all players.

Okay, so it uses an average. Why is that so bad? It uses an average and Soriano is above that... yet he sucks. That makes a fuckload of sense.

you didnt answer my question...

Who comes up with these park rankings? How do they come up with them?


Averages are skewed by people with high or low numbers.
If an OF has twice as many outs as Soriano, the average will be higher, thus skewing soriano's stats
 

Captain Obvious

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Jul 31, 2010
Posts:
4,967
Liked Posts:
697
you didnt answer my question...

Who comes up with these park rankings? How do they come up with them?


Averages are skewed by people with high or low numbers.
If an OF has twice as many outs as Soriano, the average will be higher, thus skewing soriano's stats

Here.

UZR is not perfect, however, it is the best that we have right now.
 

DewsSox79

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 24, 2010
Posts:
29,059
Liked Posts:
7,249
Once again another thread goes off topic. a simple thread about positions goes into a "defend-a-cub"
 

tbo41fan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
15,922
Liked Posts:
2,701
Location:
Chicago, IL
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Arizona Wildcats
No, no it's not.

That guy uses so many things that are affected by people OTHER THAN THE ACTUAL PERSON WE ARE DISCUSSING.

I'd rather watch Soriano play and see what he does rather than get a number based off what mph the wind was and how many hotdogs were sold in his "zone" of the park or whatever random stuff he uses
 

Captain Obvious

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Jul 31, 2010
Posts:
4,967
Liked Posts:
697
No, no it's not.

That guy uses so many things that are affected by people OTHER THAN THE ACTUAL PERSON WE ARE DISCUSSING.

I'd rather watch Soriano play and see what he does rather than get a number based off what mph the wind was and how many hotdogs were sold in his "zone" of the park or whatever random stuff he uses

That's fine, you can do that. However, to completely refute saber metrics is frivolous. It's not 1960, we're advancing in the world. Soriano is a good LFer, if you want to close your eyes and say nanananananananaana and pretend it isn't true, you can. Be my guest.
 

DewsSox79

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 24, 2010
Posts:
29,059
Liked Posts:
7,249
That's fine, you can do that. However, to completely refute saber metrics is frivolous. It's not 1960, we're advancing in the world. Soriano is a good LFer, if you want to close your eyes and say nanananananananaana and pretend it isn't true, you can. Be my guest.

so sig worthy! thank you!
 

tbo41fan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
15,922
Liked Posts:
2,701
Location:
Chicago, IL
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Arizona Wildcats
That's fine, you can do that. However, to completely refute saber metrics is frivolous. It's not 1960, we're advancing in the world. Soriano is a good LFer, if you want to close your eyes and say nanananananananaana and pretend it isn't true, you can. Be my guest.
Good god....


All I can say is :nelson:
so sig worthy! thank you!

:lmao:
 

derosabomb

Joecawks is a dope
Donator
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
9,066
Liked Posts:
3,630
Location:
Chicago
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  2. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
soriano would probably play better on his knees in LF. dude kinda sucks out there.
 

Captain Obvious

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Jul 31, 2010
Posts:
4,967
Liked Posts:
697
So because all the stats point to him being a good LFer and your eyes say no, that makes him bad? What else do you have besides this see-say?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top