- Joined:
- May 4, 2010
- Posts:
- 27,077
- Liked Posts:
- 15,145
And it's obvious you will stop short of nothing to have your shit headed arguments invade another form of media.
Who still thinks CHI should have traded Deng & Noah & a pick for Carmelo Anthony?
- Thread starter RamiTheBullsFan
- Start date
- Status
And it's obvious you will stop short of nothing to have your shit headed arguments invade another form of media.
- Joined:
- Apr 16, 2010
- Posts:
- 9,505
- Liked Posts:
- 1,733
Haha. right. You don't actually respond to anything on-point anyway. Instead, you read into what people say and respond to it in the context of whatever you want it to be to being insulting to stroke your own ego. Which I am sure does wonders for your self-esteem.
- Joined:
- Apr 16, 2010
- Posts:
- 9,505
- Liked Posts:
- 1,733
And which "shit-headed" argument do you speak of?
- Joined:
- May 4, 2010
- Posts:
- 27,077
- Liked Posts:
- 15,145
LOL at this.
You: Carmelo is dominated by the games best
Me: *SHows stats proving otherwise*
You: Those guys are better than Carmelo, it's not even a debate
Me: Uh ok? I never said Carmelo was better than them. I was responding to your shitheaded assertions.
and I'm the one that can't stay on point?!
Are you unable to read this thread?
- Joined:
- May 4, 2010
- Posts:
- 27,077
- Liked Posts:
- 15,145
I'm convinced now the lockout is still going on because NBA players have read Rami discuss the sport and want to try to prevent him from discussing it futher.
- Joined:
- Apr 16, 2010
- Posts:
- 9,505
- Liked Posts:
- 1,733
- Joined:
- May 4, 2010
- Posts:
- 27,077
- Liked Posts:
- 15,145
:yawn:
Explanation fail.
The voicemail sucked. Some was "static-ed" out.
Plus, if that's what you meant than you would have brought it up right away as soon as I showed stats. Rather you are again trying to back track out of your horrible asserstion as it's taking you multiple posts to get to this point.
You really suck at this.
Quit trying.
Quit discussing basketball. You hurt the game each time you do.
- Joined:
- Apr 16, 2010
- Posts:
- 9,505
- Liked Posts:
- 1,733
So now you are explaining to me what I actually meant when I am explaining it as clear as day?
- Joined:
- Apr 16, 2010
- Posts:
- 9,505
- Liked Posts:
- 1,733
And the only reason I am responding this way is because I lost my posts because my net disconnected. You have absolutely no idea what I was going to post and only have what I am saying to you right now to judge from.
- Joined:
- May 4, 2010
- Posts:
- 27,077
- Liked Posts:
- 15,145
Yes. Because it's clear all you are doing now is changing your argument because your original version o fit got blown out of the water. If what you just voice mailed was correct then you would have pointed that out in your original rebuttle, but instead your original response revolved around me using regular season games to evaluate it.
Weak effort kid.
- Joined:
- Apr 16, 2010
- Posts:
- 9,505
- Liked Posts:
- 1,733
Again, you are assuming what I would and wouldn't have said/what I did/didn't mean when you literally have no way of knowing. I don't respond as well when it comes to typing because I am impatient and put out a rushed statement. This way, you know exactly what I am talking about- no ifs, ands, or buts about it.
- Joined:
- May 4, 2010
- Posts:
- 27,077
- Liked Posts:
- 15,145
I'm not assuming anything.
I've read your filth.
Quit trying to defend your uneducated blabber.
You also don't respond well speaking.
Sucks.
- Joined:
- Apr 16, 2010
- Posts:
- 9,505
- Liked Posts:
- 1,733
Your mother must have done a number on you. So I respond in a way that you don't care to respond to (because you can't multi-quote me in a ******-ingly deceptive way) so now you feel compelled to insult my speaking skills and my microphone quality.
Oh, yeah. And you can read my mind and you know EXACTLY what the intentions were behind my original one-liner statements!
- Joined:
- May 4, 2010
- Posts:
- 27,077
- Liked Posts:
- 15,145
Sometimes before I post I like to double check adn fact check what I'm about to say before I ramble off and come off like an uneducated ignorant Special person. Plus, with cobbled together bullshit like you post it's easier to try and break it down into more manageble Special person sections.
Yes.
Not exactly tough to read your mind kid.
I've already pointed out how I did it.
- Joined:
- Apr 16, 2010
- Posts:
- 9,505
- Liked Posts:
- 1,733
^So, in a nutshell... you pretttty much don't care to respond to anything I say about basketball and just want to act like a dick. Congrats. You have proven your maturity level.
- Joined:
- May 4, 2010
- Posts:
- 27,077
- Liked Posts:
- 15,145
El. OH. EL. At this.
I've responded to every basketball Special person comment you've made in this thread. That's what started this entire damn thing.
STUF and quit playing the victim and acting as though you've made any points that have held up.
You haven't.
- Joined:
- Apr 16, 2010
- Posts:
- 9,505
- Liked Posts:
- 1,733
Really, because you haven't. Everything I explained in the voice messages was completely ignored.
20 people (to 2) disagree with your meat-headed assertion that the Bulls should have definitely traded Noah and Deng for Anthony.
- Joined:
- May 4, 2010
- Posts:
- 27,077
- Liked Posts:
- 15,145
Because it was the same ole shit puked up a different way. It was redundant and boring and I lost interest when you kept falling all over yourself speaking. It was like trying to listen to George Bush give an extemporaneous speech about the tax code.
Great. We have quantifiable proof this site is basketball Special person.
- Joined:
- Apr 16, 2010
- Posts:
- 9,505
- Liked Posts:
- 1,733
Once again, yet another insult about how I speak. As if anybody actually gives a shit about my mediocre oratory skills
Right, this site is Special person. Saying shit like this, it is amazing that Rush hasn't banned you.
Who would you rather have- Dwight Howard or Carmelo Anthony? Because it would seem clear, to me, that if you have a player who is the number 1 center in the NBA (in a league with NO OTHER ELITE CENTERS) that you would stand a MUCH better chance of winning a championship than with a guy who (a) plays little defense, (b) takes questionable shots, and (c) has tunnel vision and rarely passes when receiving the ball in his comfort spots.
- Joined:
- May 4, 2010
- Posts:
- 27,077
- Liked Posts:
- 15,145
I do.
:dunno:
I said basketball Special person.
You just agreed with me.
See above.
In fact, I've reported this post to the mods.
On the Bulls?
Who am I giving up? What's the cap implications? Etc etc.
It's not a simple question.
- Status