Will the real Patrick Kane please stand up?

[Pounder]

I already pointed it out but it was exactly what he was "TOLD" do be doing in that situation.



Not sure we ever win the Cup if he didn't do it during game #5. I can see Pounder is going to do one of two things. Be toyed with for the tool he appears to be, and or banned before it goes two long.



My bet is on both.

I'm gonna be banned? Why?

 

[Tater]

There's something called an "Ignore Button"... novel concept, I know, but maybe instead of being a baby about it and pouting about who is who, people can start using it and making this a happy place.



It's great, you won't have to sift through things that you think are "bullshit" anymore! Wonderful feature.



I'll even go as far as showing you how to use it... with pictures. Just scroll over someones name and viola! Two different buttons to ignore that piece of shit that's annoying you all the time!

Thanks for using Masshavoc as the example. Now I know exactly how to put him on ignore.

 

[MassHavoc]

HEY NOW! I resemble that comment.



I do love that when I click on Ton's link I get this: [#10171] You do not have permission to view this attachment.

 

[Ton]

Haha, whoops... changed it.

 

[MassHavoc]

I just thought you didn't want me figuring out how to ignore myself.

 

[puckjim]

I'm gonna be banned? Why?

Because you refuse to respond when your point is countered.



Myself, Pez, and RK all responded to your idiotic Olczyk remark, yet you say nothing.



Don't post unless you're willing to discuss.



Simple.

 

[winos5]

HEY NOW! I resemble that comment.



I do love that when I click on Ton's link I get this: [#10171] You do not have permission to view this attachment.

Just don't click on his 4th round draft pick trade bait links.

 

[howcho]

yous been harsh

 

[Pounder]

Because you refuse to respond when your point is countered.



Myself, Pez, and RK all responded to your idiotic Olczyk remark, yet you say nothing.



Don't post unless you're willing to discuss.



Simple.

What's to discuss Jim? Someone calls me a fucking idiot and that's what you want me to respond to? How about discussing the topic at hand? What a novel idea.

 

[puckjim]

What's to discuss Jim? Someone calls me a fucking idiot and that's what you want me to respond to? How about discussing the topic at hand? What a novel idea.

All three of us responded to you relative to the topic at hand.



You didn't counter any one of us.



That's how you'll get banned here.

 

[BlackHawkPaul]

No one's going to be banned. Yet.

 

[R K]

No one's going to be banned. Yet.

Shut up Bert.



I really meant ***** but couldn't get past your picture!

 

[BlackHawkPaul]

Shut up Bert.



I really meant ***** but couldn't get past your picture!

Yeah.



I couldn't get past yours either.

Just admit that you wanna be my Ernie.

 

[Pounder]

All three of us responded to you relative to the topic at hand.



You didn't counter any one of us.



That's how you'll get banned here.

I don't see you discussing anything here at all. Rather I see you just playing up to an audience of friends here. As soon as you and a few others started with the name calling you lost credibility. I'll have an adult conversation with anyone. But if you're looking for me to get in a pissing match with you and trade profanities back and forth then I'll gladly take the ban and go someplace else.

 

[MassHavoc]

No one is banning anyone but there were counter points stated that you are ignoring while trying to high behind the figurative high ground.

 

[R K]

Sorry but anyone quoting Eddie "No Check" and or Milbury "I beat children up on the ice" needs to read more and post less.



Then again by the picture above I just get pissed off and leave for a few days with my Ball!

 

[puckjim]

I don't see you discussing anything here at all. Rather I see you just playing up to an audience of friends here. As soon as you and a few others started with the name calling you lost credibility. I'll have an adult conversation with anyone. But if you're looking for me to get in a pissing match with you and trade profanities back and forth then I'll gladly take the ban and go someplace else.

I did zero name-calling. I said your Olczyk comment was idiotic, and it was.



All you have to do is defend your argument against those presented.



You won't do that.....Likely because you can't.



Good riddance.

 

[R K]

man working has you feisty!! I like it *****!

 

[puckjim]

man working has you feisty!! I like it *****!

Pent up energy.



Usually I just **********, but this is nice too.

 

[Pounder]

To PuckJim - I replayed the DVR of the game. Sorry, but Kane is being called out. The announcers wouldn't have said he left his team defending a 5-on-3 if this was a compliment. They would have said Kane is staying back for a pass out to the point. Also the tone of the announcers was of disappointment. Listen to it again.



To RK - game #5 against Nashville was NOT the same situation. Kane did NOT have a breakaway by lurking at center ice to score the tying goal. Go back and watch it. The Hawks were in the offensive zone for quite a few passes. Kane tied the game by going to the net. Totally different situation than hanging back at center ice while your team is in the defensive zone trying to get it out on a 5-on-3 cause Kane won't go back to help them out.



To Pez - I agree that it's fine to keep someone at center ice at times when you're down a goal, but in this case the Hawks were also on a penalty kill and they were struggling to cycle the puck out of their own zone. Kane needs to come back and help in that situation. As you saw, precious time ticked off the clock cause it was 5-on-3 without him back there to help out.