- Joined:
- Aug 23, 2012
- Posts:
- 9,995
- Liked Posts:
- 3,624
My favorite teams
If I had to guess, the Rays will be a better matchup.I am off of the Ross thing. I hope they target one of the Indians or Rays pitchers.
If I had to guess, the Rays will be a better matchup.I am off of the Ross thing. I hope they target one of the Indians or Rays pitchers.
I am off of the Ross thing. I hope they target one of the Indians or Rays pitchers.
How many years of control would the Cubs have with Fernandez? His agent is Boras and will probably ask for 10/$300M when his time comes. Baez + Soler + Top Prospect is a lot to give up.
The biggest rumor right now is that the Cubs are trying to sign Hayward and simultaneously trade Soler.
Now what sense does that make?
Better not be trading Soler for some lame hitting CF and we already have more P's than we can put on the roster.
the plan would be heyward in CF for the beginning of the contract. RF would be played by a mix of coghlan, baez, zobrist. I think cubs can and will pull of the heyward deal. give him an opt out clause after year 3 or 4 of the deal and kind of hope he does opt out so you are free of the contract in a few years and got some prime years of him without any down years in his mid 30's at the end of the deal
That's all great. But you didn't tell me why you would need to simultaneously trade Soler in that grand plan.
the plan would be heyward in CF for the beginning of the contract. RF would be played by a mix of coghlan, baez, zobrist. I think cubs can and will pull of the heyward deal. give him an opt out clause after year 3 or 4 of the deal and kind of hope he does opt out so you are free of the contract in a few years and got some prime years of him without any down years in his mid 30's at the end of the deal
free up a lil $$$ to compensate for all the $$ to heyward. get a young controllable arm for soler. and like I DID mention you play a mix of coghlan, zobrist, baez, etc in RF to replace soler. if soler stays on the team then what do you do with coghlan for example? the outfield is full and has guys like baez and zobrist cutting into playing time out there as well
An opt out clause = He's good, he leaves. He's not, he stays.
Is that a good thing?
An opt out clause = He's good, he leaves. He's not, he stays.
Is that a good thing?
You answered WHAT they could do IF they traded Soler. You didn't answer WHY they should trade Soler.
And "to make room for Coghlan" isn't an adequate answer. (No offense to Coghlan, who I like.)
actually try again, I mentioned to free up some $$ to compensate for signing heyward. go get up somebody elses ass cuz im not in the mood for nitpicking
You do realize that Soler has a cap of only $3.6 mill. What are you going to get back of equatable value for less than that to free up a few pennies?
Going back to the ATL/AZ trade, it's interesting that Miller cost the DBacks a #1 SS pick (Dansby), yet the word here was ATL wanted Soler and not Baez from the Cubs.
I would have hung the phone up on ATL, if that was the case.CBS Sports Chicago and the sun times said Atlanta wanted Bryant for Miller
http://chicago.suntimes.com/basebal...king-kris-bryant-potential-shelby-miller-deal