- Joined:
- Aug 23, 2012
- Posts:
- 9,995
- Liked Posts:
- 3,624
My favorite teams
Why do people keep misspelling Zobrist as Zorbrist?
Why do people keep misspelling Zobrist as Zorbrist?
Could be.Zorbist the "Greek"? :shrug:
I know it sounds strange but one reason I don't want to get Heyward is because teams that win the off-season (on-paper champs) seem to never win the WS. Look at Washington last year. On-paper they appeared to be the best team in baseball, but there is so many other elements at play (chemistry, etc) that can't be accounted for.
Heyward would win us the off-season and on-paper we'd look like an unbeatable juggernaut. But it just seems to me that those teams usually have too much star power and not enough intangibles to generate the necessary chemistry.
Is this a total bizarre thought?
I am a little intrigued by Span and his high OBP. Having two guys at the top of the order (Zorbrist and Span) with high OBP% before murderer's row (Rizzo, Bryant, Schwarber, and Soler) would seem to set the table up nicely.
I think that if we sign Heyward to 200 mill he won't be able to live up to expectations. It's almost impossible to play up to that and that has got to make it extremely difficult for the player too. I don't feel sorry for them for 200 mil reasons. I think you probably get better results with a slightly less bigger name and use that money for more than one guy! The guy is a 280 hitter. Babe Ruth must be rolling over in his grave! Maybe I'm old, it just seems like a ton of money for his caliber of play but then again fowler is looking for 15 year.
If you were to predict what player is most likely to be worth 200 million (over 10 years), Jason Heyward may be as good a bet as ever to do it. First, 20 million a year isn't that much compared to the top end of baseball. Secondly, he's easily worth 20 million a year if he's 80-90% of what he was the past years. He's so young for a UFA that signing HIM to a long term deal is likely to not be a bad deal.
To add to that, in eight years, when he is just 34, twenty million is going to be a bargain considering what they just paid Zobrist, especially with the inflation of salaries from year to year.
Just look at what Cubs fans thought about Soriano in 2007. Eighteen million per year for the biggest free agent on the market?
Eight years later, and TOR pitchers are making 32-34 million per year, or roughly, a million dollars per start.
So then the White Sox who got Eaton for 5 more years at roughly 23.5 million is greatest bargain ever?Jason Heyward is criminally underrated for two reasons
1. A lot of his value is defensive so if he slips then he goes from 5-7 WAR to 2-3 quite quick
2. His bat never took that jump that everyone expected
The value for the Cubs is they simply need Heyward to be a .275 hitter who plays GG defense. And 20 million/year for that is a bargain.
If you were to predict what player is most likely to be worth 200 million (over 10 years), Jason Heyward may be as good a bet as ever to do it. First, 20 million a year isn't that much compared to the top end of baseball. Secondly, he's easily worth 20 million a year if he's 80-90% of what he was the past years. He's so young for a UFA that signing HIM to a long term deal is likely to not be a bad deal.
So then the White Sox who got Eaton for 5 more years at roughly 23.5 million is greatest bargain ever?
The White Sox got that price on Eaton because they bought out his arbitration years/one year of FA, not an UFA so they're not comparable contracts.
Also, Fangraphs defensive WAR past two years
Eaton - 1.6, -8.8
Heyward - 17.3, 16.4
So no, the White Sox are not getting GG defense.
Taking the hype out of this crazy time of year, please explain how 13 HR and 60 RBI is production worth $20 mil/year.If Heyward signs a 10 year deal it's most likely going have an opt out in 3-4 years anyway. Can't predict what will happen (injuries, etc) but who wouldn't want him at essentially 4-5 years at 80-100 million?