czman
Well-known member
- Joined:
- May 7, 2013
- Posts:
- 2,210
- Liked Posts:
- 545
They did win 97 games last year. Really hard for them not to.
A step can be measured in more than just wins and loses.
They did win 97 games last year. Really hard for them not to.
A step can be measured in more than just wins and loses.
You're letting that diploma down.That just shows you what I think about the guy that I don't even know his name.
He was just fine in the first half. He was never the same after the hammy injury. If nothing happens, use him in the first half and jettison him in time for the playoff run for a prospect from another team.He sucked for the Cubs last year and I'd like to see him be escorted out of town ASAP. Hendricks is fine at #5, Lackey is more of a #4 at his age. Cubs need someone to stick in the #3 slot, preferably Gray or Salazar.
You're letting that diploma down.
He was just fine in the first half. He was never the same after the hammy injury. If nothing happens, use him in the first half and jettison him in time for the playoff run for a prospect from another team.
Is 95 games and a division win a step back? I'd be more concerned with not making the NLCS. That would be a "step back".They did win 97 games last year. Really hard for them not to.
Is 95 games and a division win a step back? I'd be more concerned with not making the NLCS. That would be a "step back".
do people forget how last season went?
First 97 games: 51-46 (.526% aka 85 win pace)
last 65 games: 46 - 19 (.708% aka 114 win pace)
the cubs the last two+ months were world beaters. While it would be great to make drastic changes, they are way more likely to get internal improvement from hitters than they are to go out in fa and acquire a ton of hitters who hit at high levels. The cubs are not a team that needs to do anything that drastic, just a little tinkering is sufficient.
And I guarantee if they get bounced in the wild card game or NLDS, apologists will come on here defending the team and management and keep going on about "Well shucks, all you can ask is they get in the playoffs and then anything can happen."
Sounds like the Cubs are trying to get Zobrist and then move Castro. I'd do that trade.
My take away is the cubs seem to be casting a wide net on options and will pick and choose what suits them. Not sure if that's a good thing or bad because seems like other teams hyper focus on stuff and while you can easily see the reason why the cubs would go that route, I'm sure theres reasons against it.
And I guarantee if they get bounced in the wild card game or NLDS, apologists will come on here defending the team and management and keep going on about "Well shucks, all you can ask is they get in the playoffs and then anything can happen."
No, this sounds like the Cubs are moving contracts/guys. The Castro move is going to free up the money for the Zobrist move. I think the two are tied together so it's a both/neither type thing.