- Joined:
- Jun 28, 2010
- Posts:
- 3,689
- Liked Posts:
- 754
I think people are listening to these biased sports analyst too much who want nothing more than to diminish the Bulls titles in the 90's.
i would say he was best in my eyes, he was smarter then those players. playoffs, 93, 96, 97 and 98 finals showed us why
i would say he was best in my eyes, he was smarter then those players. playoffs, 93, 96, 97 and 98 finals showed us why
I think people are listening to these biased sports analyst too much who want nothing more than to diminish the Bulls titles in the 90's.
Horace Grant was a very under-appreciated player. He brought rebounding, interior defense, very good post scoring, a mid-range jumper, and pick and roll offense to the Bulls.
To say that Kukoc was Pippen's 2nd best scorer in 1994 shows you don't know much about that team at all.
I wouldn't say Pippen was better than Olajuwon, Malone, Barkley, Ewing, Robinson, Stockton, or Gary Payton in 1994.
He was NOT smarter than Hakeem. And you don't have anything to base that on. Smarter this... smarter that... that is all subjective. Those players were either flat out monsters down-low or way more skilled than Pippen was. Not as VASTLY skilled but they had bigger weapons in their artillery.
Hakeem was the best player in the NBA EASILY when Jordan was gone.
watch the games and you will get the answer ))))
BJ armstrong was also an all star that year
You obviously just watched Bulls' games then.
Yep. That goes to show 97 for saying Kukoc was Pippen's #2... c'mon
olajuwon was definitely better and arguably robinson...pippen was overall a more balanced better player than stockton...also better than malone and payton imo....
i think he was 3rd best behind robinson and olajuwon...although thats jmo
although i think many here are slightly overrating him...pippen was a fantastic all around player..versatile,great rebounder and passer,etc.
pippen was definitely a major reason for the bulls winning 55 games
i watched some games from 97 jazz - rockets and how utah defended exellent against hakeem so he did nothing on offensive end
I think Stockton was a little bit better than Pippen until the later 90s when Stock lost a big step. Bulls' fans really don't realize how old Stockton was in the 97 and 98 Finals... he used to be a Steve Nash like scorer (not that good but with a higher concentration of high-percentage shots). He was a better on-ball defender than Pippen and so was Gary Payton. GP was an unbelievable play-maker for himself and others. Ewing, Barkley, and Robinson were all light years ahead of Pippen in terms of scoring and rebounding. Barkley was a very mediocre defender but he wasn't a piss poor one either like a lot of people would have you believe. Not to mention Shaq... his rookie season was probably better than Pippen's 1994 season in all honesty. And he was still a raw talent back then too.
I would put Pippen above any of those guys defensively. Pippen could guard 4 positions adeptly. Pippen was good offensively but he was not great like the other players named. But I think he was the best perimeter defender of that era, and maybe any era. I just think he wasn't good in the clutch and couldn't be depended on that much. When you think of clutch players...Scottie NEVER comes up in conversation.
I think Stockton was a little bit better than Pippen until the later 90s when Stock lost a big step. Bulls' fans really don't realize how old Stockton was in the 97 and 98 Finals... he used to be a Steve Nash like scorer (not that good but with a higher concentration of high-percentage shots). He was a better on-ball defender than Pippen and so was Gary Payton. GP was an unbelievable play-maker for himself and others. Ewing, Barkley, and Robinson were all light years ahead of Pippen in terms of scoring and rebounding. Barkley was a very mediocre defender but he wasn't a piss poor one either like a lot of people would have you believe. Not to mention Shaq... his rookie season was probably better than Pippen's 1994 season in all honesty. And he was still a raw talent back then too.
I would put Pippen above any of those guys defensively. Pippen could guard 4 positions adeptly. Pippen was good offensively but he was not great like the other players named. But I think he was the best perimeter defender of that era, and maybe any era. I just think he wasn't good in the clutch and couldn't be depended on that much. When you think of clutch players...Scottie NEVER comes up in conversation.