- Joined:
- Apr 23, 2010
- Posts:
- 5,227
- Liked Posts:
- 1,551
- Location:
- Rockford, IL
didnt you, just last week also say olsez us a bum?
....
Maybe he scored a point or something... :shrug:
didnt you, just last week also say olsez us a bum?
turned aside 31 of 32 shots in a 3-1 victory Thursday night. Crawford[s record improved to 3-1-1 with that victory. He has a 1.79 GAA and .935 save percentage in five starts. (Source: Rotoworld.com)
Nick Leddyhas not registered a point in the Blackhawks' last three games. He was doing well as a pivot for the Hawks' first four games, but he seems to be in a bit of a slump at present. Watch this situation carefully, as Chicago coach Joel Quenneville could move him back alongside Jonathan Toews on the team's first unit in a heartbeat. (Source: Chicago Tribune)
has a goal and four points in seven games this season. Leddy only had seven points in 46 contests in 2010-11, but that's not an accurate representation of what he can do offensively. He's been paired up with Duncan Keith and that seems to have helped so far. Keep an eye on him over the next few weeks. (Source: Chicago Tribune)
I do not want to see leddy/keith paired up ever again.
Carcillo has played fine, someone said he skates like he is in mud or something.....i cant believe that was said, carcillo has been a nice surprise.
kaner has looked great
toews will get it going im sure.
bolland is sick
hossa is still the boss
anyone complaining about krueger and or stalberg should be taken to the pasture and spanked, they are fucking 4th liners.......who gives a ****?
i still hate hammer
sharp on the shootout is annoying
if anyone is skating in mud it is brunette.......yikes.
yeah, im tired..........
I missed the last game - the homer against the avs - but in the previous 2 games, the pairing of Keith and Leddy was much improved. They played well.
Part of me wants to say it's just because Keith is aparently getting his game back, but Leddy made some smart plays and looked good on his own.
Were they bad in the 2nd avs game? I have it on dvr but havent had the time to watch.
About had enough of Brunette on the 1st line. Guy blows major ass 5 on 5.
Q & his love affair with Stalclown.
Olesz can at least play solid defense.
Who needs that when you have a speed skater that can't finish?
But his fan club will continue to make excuses for the horrendous hockey player.
Q & his love affair with Stalclown.
Olesz can at least play solid defense.
Who needs that when you have a speed skater that can't finish?
But his fan club will continue to make excuses for the horrendous hockey player.
Can't believe I'm saying this.
Happy we have Carcillo
And you will continue to shoot him down without giving a good reason.
The only reason I think of is that he is so fast, you expect him to be a top 6 forward - which he clearly isn't. But that doesn't make him a bad player. He is a versatile 4th liner at the moment because of his willingness to go into corners and his speed. Also, he accepts his role on the 4th line.
Your turn, if you truly believe what you are saying, reply to my post. Good luck.
At the moment, I don't have any facts to back me up but I am also not one that is impressed by Stalberg. I understand that his production isn't going to be great because he isn't a top 6 forward but I also don't think he makes the most of his opportunities.
Granted, I will completely admit that my opinion is just based on the "eye" test, from what I've seen of him last year and this year. I just don't get the apparent love for him. He has some speed but I'm not sure about him winning any puck battles on the boards and I think people give him way too much credit for being "gritty." To me, he is mostly finesse and that's fine if that's his game, but if finesse is his game, he needs to produce more because his forechecking/defense has a lot left to be desired.
The problem is that nobody is in love with him and wants him to get Kane money.....the ones who like him see him for what he is, a cheap, decent player....the others think we are in love with him and want him to stay forever...none of us feel like that, we just approve of his play as a 4th liner making low money
Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk
And I can respect that... but I don't think you talk for everyone, I think others value him a lot more then you do.
And Kane is overpaid, btw. He is not nearly as valuable as Toews and makes the same money as him. (I had to throw that in there when you mentioned "Kane" money, haha )
Honestly, I haven't seen one person here say that Stalberg is a top 6 forward.
He has the speed to be a top 6 forward, but he clearly isn't. He is a versatile 4th liner on the team. He can jump up to the top 6 to fill in every once in a while because of his speed. He has accepted his role on the 4th line quite well.
I take him for what he is and I think he is decent at it.