<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Variable" data-cid="211551" data-time="1382057720">
<div>
I didn't say it would though. That's never been the argument. My post was talking about stricter discipline by the league for dirty/cheap hits. The better argument for getting rid of fighting is simply because it doesn't do anything and you only ever have something to lose, nothing to gain. As you said it doesn't affect the dirty players in deterring them. So why would the league willingly contribute to potential further head trauma for players for no good reason while, at the same time, talk about how serious they want to take that issue? Until they disallow that from happening, they're being massive hypocrites. The amount of concussions is never going to equal what you get from hits, just because of the sheer amount of hits vs. fights, but the percentages are higher you get it from a fight rather than a hit.</p>
</p>
Rest of the post besides the suspension being as long as the injured player is out I can agree with. Especially on the neutral doctor point. That should exist for everything, not just head injuries. Never liked the idea of team appointed doctors in any sport.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
I don't agree with the "doesn't do anything." We're human and blodthrisrty creatures by nature, no matter what the Kumbaya Coalition wants you to believe and there is the need for revenge and retribution that, when cashed in, will naturally lift the spirits of anyone. My wife is the real expert, but when you get charged emotionally, you can push yourself a bit further and in the established culture of hockey, a good fight (i.e., not staged and in the heat of the moment) can push a team positively.</p>
</p>
Should that be at the expense of players' long term health? Of couse not, but IMHO cheap plays like we've seen on the last 2 plages of this thread are much more of a danger to the long-term health of the players than a fight. And, if there's a slight chance that a fight would stop a Maxime Lapierre, Raffi Torres, or Matt Cooke (especially the fight between Cooke and E. Kane) from cheapshotting a player for a few games because they're concussed, thats not a bad thing. Ultimately, it goes back to the leage not pussyfotting about suspensions for cheap play.</p>
</p>
And as for Team Doctors, I don't think that they are a bad idea. A team doctor should know the ins-and-outs of each player, their medical history, etc. and as such, are a good think in the long run. However, when it comes to dealing with the severity of an injury or clearing someone to play, a neutral doctor should make the call.</p>