beckdawg
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Oct 31, 2012
- Posts:
- 11,750
- Liked Posts:
- 3,741
Jalen Beeks to tb for Nathan Eovaldi. Mlb.com had beeks as a 45 grade. If that's the going rate for a back end starter that seems promising given the cubs needs.
Right..This morning I heard the only guys that get to 7 regularly are Scherzer, Sale and one guy that is available, James Shields.
Looks like JA Happ next in line for the cubs...
Watch for hugs in the minors
https://twitter.com/Michael_Cerami/status/1022223655483449346?s=19
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk
Any catcher who can hit is going to gain attention. I mean look caratini isn't pudge back there but at A+ when he started to creep onto radar he had a 111 wRC+ which is similar. Also worth noting it's often that catchers bats take longer to come around.
What a trade deadline without a rumored Chris Archer and Cubs
http://www.bleachernation.com/2018/...bout-the-cubs-and-chris-archer-again-isnt-it/
Just throwing this out there but if i recall, cubs struck quick the last couple years when adding a significant player to the team..
So, have to think with them being quiet to this point outside Chavez and with just 5 days left, might be safe to say we shouldn't expect anything of significant from them outside maybe adding another low key reliever who can start like Chavez...
Think their just gonna go forward with what they got and hope key players get hot at the right time...
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk
Normally catchers will take longer just based off of game calling. Hitting/catching/framing are all more skill related. Game calling is scouting and game experience. Knowing you pitcher and noticing if a adjustment needs to me made. How to pitch that guy the 2nd time etc. That comes with in game and that is why catchers take longer in general.
Shoot I'll accept less at the plate if he is making the team better and the pitcher better.
I agree, that what im saying...I find no reason for Theo to not be honest. He was pretty strait forward that they were not going to be looking to make a plunge. Chavez was exactly what he was talking about and I believe the under the radar rumor vs the typical big name attachment just because some writer sees a match up.
I agree, that what im saying...
The last 2 years he went out and got that big name right away..
Chapman in 2016
Quintana in 2017
With 4 days til deadline, makes you think he staying simple this year..
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk
I read the opposite...Depending on how much money texas would eat and how good of a prospect the cubs might have to give up, I'm down with Hamels. He's obviously not what he once was but pitching in Texas isn't doing him any favors and he has postseason experience. Plus if things go right with Darvish you're not needing him to carry you just to be a #4 or #5.
I read the opposite...
Cubs would eat the rest of his 20 mil owed this year for a lesser return..
Next is a buyout year for 6 mil if they wanna go that route..
I have my doubts on Darvish returning and or being affective ...
If he does, Monty goes to pen for rest of season which would eliminate the need of another mid reliever..
Come postseason, guess you get your choice to pick which starter you want in the 4th spot for a series between Hamel and Darvish, with the other going to the pen or sitting it out
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk
Joel Sherman
✔
@Joelsherman1
Between rest of salary this yr plus buyout on 2019 option, Hamels owed roughly $14.2M. Hear that if deal with #Cubs goes thru they will pick up about $4M and give up secondary prospects. But NO deal is in place yet, Cubs just more involved than other suitors.
2:06 PM - Jul 26, 2018
139
92 people are talking about this
Joel Sherman
✔
@Joelsherman1
Just got it in an even stronger way that Hamels to #Cubs has a real chance to be concluded, possibly even today. Chi does not have deep system, but #Rangers just looking to get out of any $, get some prospects. Chi would take on about $4M of $14.2M owed.
4:52 PM - Jul 26, 2018
Ok.. ill go with yours, i looked back at what i saw and noticed it was a random poster feeding off Sherman tweet, saying cubs will pick up most of the money owed for a lesser return..This is what i saw.