Les Grossman
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Jun 22, 2011
- Posts:
- 14,049
- Liked Posts:
- 12,103
Yuck at 9 overallIt's Byron Murphy week. Seen numerous people talking about him at 9.
Yuck at 9 overallIt's Byron Murphy week. Seen numerous people talking about him at 9.
Seen it several places all of a sudden now. That guy who worked with Pace was on with Hoge and had him as the 3rd best player in the entire draft.Yuck at 9 overall
Seen it several places all of a sudden now. That guy who worked with Pace was on with Hoge and had him as the 3rd best player in the entire draft.
(I’m not endorsing or shitting on it….. Just relating what I’m reading)
Josh Lucas? I saw it pop up on my youtube but have not watched it yet. Honestly, not sure I will bother because...Josh Lucas. I have no idea why all of a sudden this guy is getting air time.
You don’t understand why a guy who was high up in the Bears front office gets airtime?
Honestly? Kinda yeah. I mean, yes, I know he was high up in the Bears front office under Pace. So what? Ultimately, that front office was a failure. So, why would I listen to the evaluations of a guy who was bad at the job? They missed on multiple high end up picks, often trading up to make those misses, and handed out several bad contracts.
This guy isn't some Bears legend that was integral in building a team with playoff wins let alone even sniff a Superbowl. Lucas was a guy that was part of a front office that had a single winning season in 7 years. So really, why give him any airtime? Just to find out what the fuck not to do?
Honestly? Kinda yeah. I mean, yes, I know he was high up in the Bears front office under Pace. So what? Ultimately, that front office was a failure. So, why would I listen to the evaluations of a guy who was bad at the job? They missed on multiple high end up picks, often trading up to make those misses, and handed out several bad contracts.
This guy isn't some Bears legend that was integral in building a team with playoff wins let alone even sniff a Superbowl. Lucas was a guy that was part of a front office that had a single winning season in 7 years. So really, why give him any airtime? Just to find out what the fuck not to do?
He would be fine after a trade down but a reach at 9.Yuck at 9 overall
The same reason Dave Wannstad gets air time in Chicago, a failed ______ who now gets air time in Chicago as an expert.Josh Lucas? I saw it pop up on my youtube but have not watched it yet. Honestly, not sure I will bother because...Josh Lucas. I have no idea why all of a sudden this guy is getting air time.
Meh, that’s not a reach. He’s a unanimous first round pick on every mock I’ve seen for months. Just because the media has a guy in the teens or twenties doesn’t mean they’re right.He would be fine after a trade down but a reach at 9.
If a player is the team's #9 prospect, that team drafting him at 9 is fine.Doesn’t really matter what # they go at. If a teams thinks their are valuable to get them at whatever # they think is fine for them, then that’s fine. Sometimes it’s needs over wants for some teams. Sometimes it the other way. Some think a projected #42 pick is their #12 pick overall. Nothing wrong with it.
It all depends on a team's big board.Meh, that’s not a reach. He’s a unanimous first round pick on every mock I’ve seen for months. Just because the media has a guy in the teens or twenties doesn’t mean they’re right.
It all depends on a team's big board.
If he is the 20th best player on, say, the Bears board, it IS a reach if they get him at 9. It would mean that the Bears had 11 players who were better than him on their draft board and overreached by more than the amount of picks that were taken up to then. It could mean that the Bears passed on 11 players who they thought were better than their 20th rated player which is not a wise use of high end draft capital.
Over-drafting 12 picks in the 4th round, ok.
Over-drafting 12 picks when only 8 have been drafted is way too much.
There’s bad GM’s, players, coaches and scouts all over the media. You think they only hire HOFers or something?
At the end of the day a guy like Lucas was in Halas Hall making decisions so he has insights none of us ever will have. I for one find it extremely interesting. Now that doesn’t mean I take his opinions as gospel….. but it’s definitely insight into the process.
I don't expect them only hire HoFers. Normally you try to find a guy that at least had more than 1 good season. Barring that, you find a guy that is at least well spoken and/or looks the part. I don't know, Lucas just rubs me the wrong way.
Sorry, but you missed the key point.Why would they draft him at 9 if he was the 20th player on their board? That makes zero sense.
The same reason Dave Wannstad gets air time in Chicago, a failed ______ who now gets air time in Chicago as an expert.
Sorry, but you missed the key point.
It does not matter where you rate a player like Murphy. It does not matter where I rate a player like Murphy. It does not matter where the media rates a player like Murphy. It does not matter where 31 teams rate a player like Murphy. It only matter where the Bears rate a player like Murphy.
It the Bears rate Murphy in their top 10, picking him at 9 is wise because he is not only one of their BPA players but at a position of need.
If the Bears rate Murphy at 20 yet they draft him at 9, it was a huge reach and was only done to fill perceived needs.
Sadly, some teams do draft players because of need, over-drafting them quite often.
Now, I do not believe that Poles has shown this terrible trait.